Talk:Bloomberg Government

Page contents not supported in other languages.
Source: Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia.

NPOV

I gave some advice to the editor that created this page as he was making revisions, and I was asked to leave a comment here to summarize our interactions. The editor has been very forthright in disclosing that they are affiliated with Bloomberg, and I believe they been conscientious of

WP:NPOV. ℱorƬheℒoveofℬacon 19:11, 21 March 2012 (UTC)[reply
]

this is written as an advertisement. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 174.70.25.226 (talk) 21:23, 26 July 2012 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 5 external links on Bloomberg Government. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018.

regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check
}} (last update: 18 January 2022).

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 02:15, 22 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

A Commons file used on this page has been nominated for speedy deletion

The following Wikimedia Commons file used on this page has been nominated for speedy deletion:

You can see the reason for deletion at the file description page linked above. —Community Tech bot (talk) 16:51, 19 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Suspected undisclosed paid public relations activity

Patriots711 (talk · contribs) have made no edits except for this article and it wasn't a one time deal but used the account over sufficiently separated time span which strengthens the probability that it's an intentional single purpose account. Graywalls (talk) 07:19, 19 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]