Talk:Bodawpaya

Page contents not supported in other languages.
Source: Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia.

Copyright problem removed

"using copyrighted works from others" if you are not the copyright holder of this material, or "donating copyrighted materials"
if you are.)

For

guideline on non-free text for how to properly implement limited quotations of copyrighted text. Wikipedia takes copyright violations very seriously, and persistent violators will be blocked from editing. While we appreciate contributions, we must require all contributors to understand and comply with these policies. Thank you. DJ-Aomand (talk) 12:56, 2 November 2023 (UTC)[reply
]

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 3 external links on Bodawpaya. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018.

regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check
}} (last update: 18 January 2022).

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 20:13, 22 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Tomb

Was he incinerated or buried? Can we sequence his DNA? 172.56.38.109 (talk) 16:50, 12 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Not vandalism

Vandalism? Really? Look at my edit summary. I removed it because it was totally unsourced, this is part pf wiki policy right. Also, its unencyclopedic to include 100+ list of names, do you actually think this is good content? @Rusty4321 79.79.151.117 (talk) 08:20, 20 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]

I agree with removing the list. A list of 200 names should either not be included, or — if it fits the notability guidelines — have a separate page. Besides, it looks unsourced to me. A source has been added, but I still contend that the list shouldn't be here. Also, pinging @Rusty4321: since he left a message about the revert on 79.79.151.117's talk page. DJ-Aomand (talk) 22:23, 29 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]