Talk:Bugun liocichla

This article is rated GA-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects:

India Low‑importance This article is within the scope of WikiProject India, which aims to improve Wikipedia's coverage of India-related topics. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page.IndiaWikipedia:WikiProject IndiaTemplate:WikiProject IndiaIndia articles Low This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale. Birds Low‑importance Low This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale. WikiProject Birds To-do: edit history watch purge Here are some tasks awaiting attention: Wikify : Ninox boobook ocellata • The Institute for Bird Populations (more) Other : Add photos to bird articles needing photos (search Flickr for free images ). Add taxonomic authorities to genus articles. More outstanding tasks at the project's cleanup listing, Category:Birds articles needing attention, and Wikipedia:WikiProject Birds/Todo.

I ranked this medium importance due to it being a current event. Sabine's Sunbird talk 05:33, 12 September 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Now that we have a free image (great work Shyamal!) aren't we obliged to get rid of the fair use one? Fair use in this case is justified by the absence of a free image. Sabine's Sunbird talk 04:36, 13 September 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks. I was actually quite surprised by the presence of the photograph. I do believe the author Ramana Athreya would consider contributing the image if someone sought it but until then I think it is not fair-use enough. Shyamal 05:14, 13 September 2006 (UTC)[reply]

I took it out and replaced it with yours. We should attempt to contact him for a free photograph (maybe he has others he can share, there are certainly plenty in the paper), until then we have a free one. Sabine's Sunbird talk 05:44, 13 September 2006 (UTC)[reply]

My suggestions:

• lead is too short
• Is there a link for Emei Shan Liocichla?
• "Small flocks are observed during January, whereas pairs were observed in May, with an estimated total of 14 individuals." (Source?)
• "The species was described in 2006..." (Source?)
• There aren't any external links.

NCurse _work 21:19, 29 September 2006 (UTC)[reply]

The Emei Shan Liocichla is the same thing as the

Grey-faced Liocichla. Incidenatlly, the sole source is the article describing it (from 2006). I have to say I'm uncertain this is GA quality yet. Sabine's Sunbird talk 03:21, 30 September 2006 (UTC)[reply

]

My suggestions were answered, but I'll wait until Sabine's Sunbird expresses a new opinion. Anyway thanks for the work. NCurse _work 05:39, 30 September 2006 (UTC)[reply]

I am confident that the article meets the

GA criteria and so am passing it as the hold has run for well over a week. Eluchil404 21:36, 11 October 2006 (UTC)[reply

]

I removed this link from the section External links as it was not linking to the Field sketch as claimed. I tried to look where on the OB site the sketch is but drew a naught. Hope somebody can add the correct link. Prashanthns (talk) 01:04, 2 May 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 2 external links on Bugun liocichla. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

• Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20070628044757/http://www.specifysoftware.org/Informatics/bios/biostownpeterson/PP_IB_2006.pdf to http://www.specifysoftware.org/Informatics/bios/biostownpeterson/PP_IB_2006.pdf
• Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20070316091722/http://www.indianbirds.in/images/IB%5B1%5D.2.4.Liocichla.pdf to http://www.indianbirds.in/images/IB%5B1%5D.2.4.Liocichla.pdf
• Added {{dead link}} tag to http://www.bnhs.org/article.php?cid=Nzc%3D&sid=Mjgx&aid=Mjgx&t=Mg%3D%3D

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018.

• If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
• If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 08:22, 27 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]