Talk:Cédric Pioline

This article is rated Start-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects:

Biography: Sports and Games This article is within the scope of WikiProject Biography, a collaborative effort to create, develop and organize Wikipedia's articles about people. All interested editors are invited to join the project and contribute to the discussion. For instructions on how to use this banner, please refer to the documentation.BiographyWikipedia:WikiProject BiographyTemplate:WikiProject Biographybiography articles This article is supported by the sports and games work group (assessed as Low-importance). Tennis Mid‑importance This article is within the scope of WikiProject Tennis, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of articles that relate to tennis on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.TennisWikipedia:WikiProject TennisTemplate:WikiProject Tennistennis articles Mid This article has been rated as Mid-importance on the project's importance scale. Tennis To-do: edit history watch purge Here are some tasks awaiting attention: Open Era ATP and WTA tournament. France Mid‑importance This article is within the scope of WikiProject France, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of France on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.FranceWikipedia:WikiProject FranceTemplate:WikiProject FranceFrance articles Mid This article has been rated as Mid-importance on the project's importance scale.

This article was automatically assessed because at least one article was rated and this bot brought all the other ratings up to at least that level. BetacommandBot 02:59, 27 August 2007 (UTC)[reply]

A discussion that may affect the name or title of this article is ongoing here. Please voice any opinions or concerns on that page. After the discussion concludes, this article may be moved to a different title, in accordance with Wikipedia's Naming Conventions. Thank you. Tennis expert (talk) 18:54, 11 May 2008 (UTC)[reply]

A very lengthy discussion has taken place at now archived

As this was listed at

talk 18:37, 4 October 2008 (UTC)[reply

]

I'd be most grateful if Tennis expert were to put a convincing case that some consensus exists in a corner of WP that holds back this and other tennis-related articles from moving with the times; specifically, WRT their updating to the now widely accepted change in the treatment of dates, per the central guideline for dates and numbers, MOSNUM. I do not believe that such an outlying consensus exists; but if it did, I'd like to know why the centralised consensus for the whole project does not override this. Tony (talk) 09:54, 18 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]