Talk:CSS Squib

CSS Squib has been listed as one of the Warfare good articles under the good article criteria. If you can improve it further, please do so. If it no longer meets these criteria, you can reassess it. Review: August 30, 2023. (Reviewed version).

This article is rated GA-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects:

Ships This article is within the scope of WikiProject Ships, a project to improve all Ship-related articles. If you would like to help improve this and other articles, please join the project, or contribute to the project discussion. All interested editors are welcome. To use this banner, please see the full instructions.ShipsWikipedia:WikiProject ShipsTemplate:WikiProject ShipsShips articles United States Low‑importance This article is within the scope of WikiProject United States, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of topics relating to the United States of America on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the ongoing discussions. Template Usage Articles Requested! Become a Member Project Talk Alerts United StatesWikipedia:WikiProject United StatesTemplate:WikiProject United StatesUnited States articles Low This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale. Military history: Maritime / North America / United States / American Civil War This article is within the scope of the Military history WikiProject. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the project and see a list of open tasks. To use this banner, please see the full instructions.Military historyWikipedia:WikiProject Military historyTemplate:WikiProject Military historymilitary history articles Associated task forces: /  Maritime warfare task force North American military history task force United States military history task force American Civil War task force

This review is

transcluded from Talk:CSS Squib/GA1

. The edit link for this section can be used to add comments to the review.

Reviewer: Sturmvogel 66 (talk · contribs) 00:39, 27 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

I'll get to this shortly.--Sturmvogel 66 (talk) 00:39, 27 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

• Image appropriately licensed
• I don't really see a need to put the commander in the lede
• The Minnesota was not a gunboat
• Comma after North Carolina, Virginia, Nansemond River
• Link gunboat, scuttled on first use, flag of truce boat
• Tell the reader than Rocketts Point is in Richmond
• She had come under Union fire both after and immediately before the attack. awkward regarding chronology
• Rather than say at an unknown time in mid-1864, I'd suggest just saying "in mid-1864"
• Don't forget to incorporate the info from Holcombe that I sent you.--Sturmvogel 66 (talk) 19:44, 28 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]
  • @
    flag of truce. Gunboat is no longer in the article, so that is not linked. Everything else has been actioned. Hog Farm _Talk 03:45, 29 August 2023 (UTC)[reply
    ]
    • Looks good, but the link for the Minnesota is a generic one and clarify that she's a steam frigate.--Sturmvogel 66 (talk) 08:30, 29 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]
      • @Sturmvogel 66: - this should be resolved now. Hog Farm _Talk 01:24, 30 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]