Talk:Caroline Monnet

This article is rated C-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects:

Women artists This article is within the scope of WikiProject Women artists, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of women artists on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Women artistsWikipedia:WikiProject Women artistsTemplate:WikiProject Women artistsWomen artists articles Biography: Arts and Entertainment This article is within the scope of WikiProject Biography, a collaborative effort to create, develop and organize Wikipedia's articles about people. All interested editors are invited to join the project and contribute to the discussion. For instructions on how to use this banner, please refer to the documentation.BiographyWikipedia:WikiProject BiographyTemplate:WikiProject Biographybiography articles This article is supported by the arts and entertainment work group. An editor has requested that an image or photograph be added to this article. Canada: Quebec / Montreal Low‑importance Low This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale. This article is supported by WikiProject Quebec. This article is supported by WikiProject Montreal (assessed as Low-importance). project's importance scale .

	Women
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Women, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of women on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.WomenWikipedia:WikiProject WomenTemplate:WikiProject WomenWikiProject Women articles

It is requested that an image or photograph be included in this article to improve its quality. Please replace this template with a more specific media request template where possible. The Free Image Search Tool or Openverse Creative Commons Search may be able to locate suitable images on Flickr and other web sites.

Upload

Daily pageviews of this article A graph should have been displayed here but graphs are temporarily disabled. Until they are enabled again, visit the interactive graph at pageviews.wmcloud.org

Hello, I was assigned to do a peer review of your article for our film class. Your article is well written with plenty of information, but there is room for improvements. The suggestions that I would like to provide for your article are as follows: I think it would benefit your article to add more at the beginning, the purpose of this is to provide your reader with a quick snapshot of information regarding your filmmaker, enough to draw the reader in without giving away too much information. Secondly, I really like that you added a style heading in this article, it is something that I do not see all that often. However, this makes me curious as to what inspires her style of filmmaking. If you can find something that speaks to that information I believe it would greatly benefit this section. Finally, the third paragraph of your "Career" heading I believe could be partially used in the beginning as to add more flavor to the introduction. Please see my addition to this portion of your article attached. Signed, Deloros.ford94 — Preceding unsigned comment added by Deloros.ford94 (talk • contribs) 17:39, 31 October 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This article is or was the subject of a Wiki Education Foundation-supported course assignment. Further details are available on the course page. Student editor(s): Smgearnut. Peer reviewers: SaberToothCat.

Above undated message substituted from

This article is or was the subject of a Wiki Education Foundation-supported course assignment. Further details are available on the course page. Student editor(s): Jjwalkman. Peer reviewers: Nosebleedy99, Deloros.ford94.

Above undated message substituted from

There is a lot of useful and detailed information presented here, and translating it into the actual Wikipedia article was fluid and well written. That being said the actual lay out of the sandbox is a little menacing. It's all short bits of scattered and mixed information in a very long list that's very hard to read. Making headers, organising into smaller chunks, and making a lead section would be beneficial to organising and make it easier to read. Other that, great refences and great work!Nosebleedy99 (talk) 19:14, 27 October 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Hi, I will be doing a peer review of this article for our film class. The article could have categories added to it. Also a list of films and awards(if any) would help. If your education heading is that short perhaps it could either be included in background, or as a subheading of background.

More references are needed, or it is at risk of being removed by automated editors. The text could use some citations using those references. Have you looked into: Embargo project (2015) by Tailfeathers, Elle-Máijá; Hopkins, Zoe; Monnet, Caroline; Lozinski, Lori; Goulet, Danis; Arnaquq-Baril, Alethea; Chagnon, Catherine; Jackson, Lisa It is in the Carleton library.

Before I go I will link some of the words on your page. Have a nice day. — Preceding unsigned comment added by SaberToothCat (talk • contribs) 15:16, 5 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]