Talk:Caryl Churchill

This  level-5 vital article is rated C-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to multiple WikiProjects.

University of Oxford Low‑importance This article is within the scope of WikiProject University of Oxford, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of the University of Oxford on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.University of OxfordWikipedia:WikiProject University of OxfordTemplate:WikiProject University of OxfordUniversity of Oxford articles Low This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale. This article has been automatically rated by a bot or other tool because one or more other projects use this class. Please ensure the assessment is correct before removing the |auto= parameter. Theatre High‑importance This article is part of WikiProject Theatre, a WikiProject dedicated to coverage of theatre on Wikipedia. To participate: Feel free to edit the article attached to this page, join up at the project page, or contribute to the project discussion.TheatreWikipedia:WikiProject TheatreTemplate:WikiProject TheatreTheatre articles High This article has been rated as High-importance on the project's importance scale. England Low‑importance This article is within the scope of WikiProject England, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of England on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.EnglandWikipedia:WikiProject EnglandTemplate:WikiProject EnglandEngland-related articles Low This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale. Feminism Low‑importance This article is within the scope of WikiProject Feminism, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Feminism on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.FeminismWikipedia:WikiProject FeminismTemplate:WikiProject FeminismFeminism articles Low This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale. Women writers Mid‑importance This article is within the scope of WikiProject Women writers, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of women writers on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Women writersWikipedia:WikiProject Women writersTemplate:WikiProject Women writersWomen writers articles Mid This article has been rated as Mid-importance on the project's importance scale. Biography: Arts and Entertainment This article is within the scope of WikiProject Biography, a collaborative effort to create, develop and organize Wikipedia's articles about people. All interested editors are invited to join the project and contribute to the discussion. For instructions on how to use this banner, please refer to the documentation.BiographyWikipedia:WikiProject BiographyTemplate:WikiProject Biographybiography articles This article is supported by the arts and entertainment work group. This article has been automatically rated by a bot or other tool because one or more other projects use this class. Please ensure the assessment is correct before removing the |auto= parameter.

Please try to discuss the controversies surrounding Churchill's works on this page. It is certainly possible to document them without resorting to citing blogs. I have protected the page. Once there is consensus on this page about changes, any admin can un-protect the article. --

I don't think this is necessarily a content dispute. I would have reverted the edits by

WP:NPOV by presenting opinion as fact. —Snigbrook 00:22, 14 February 2009 (UTC)[reply

]

This is probably necessary. http://www.telegraph.co.uk/news/newstopics/mandrake/4612540/Caryl-Churchill-is-acccused-of-anti-Semitism.html This link as well as reviews of the play by The Times, The Guardian etc. should be used.Teatreez (talk) 16:09, 15 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]

I'd suggest writing the section here on the talk page and seeing if there is consensus to include it. If this proves to be an uncontroversial collaborative effort, I'll unprotect the article. --

☑ SamuelWantman 22:15, 16 February 2009 (UTC)[reply

]

So some of the usual suspects used the standard catch-all to attack the play, as indeed they always will. Was that it, or was there any justification for this taunt of racism? If there was reasoned justification then a synopsis should appear here. And if not why are the comments mentioned in this way at all?Kombo the mzungu (talk) 21:11, 12 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

According to our policy "Full protection is used to stop edit warring between multiple users" and "Persistent vandalism, or the possibility of such for high-trafficked articles does not usually provide a basis for full-protection". On this article, we have seen several incidents of BLP-violating vandalism in a single day by just one editor, all swiftly reverted. This does not seem sufficient to me to justify even temporary semi protection, let alone indefinite full protection. So I request that it be unblocked, to enable constructive editors to continue to improve it. RolandR (talk) 12:07, 21 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]

One person's vandalism is another person's edit war. This was never intended to be a long term block, but an attempt to get people to discuss a controversy. Since nobody is talking, and there is a request to unblock, I will unblock it. If problems persist, please request a new block on my talk page. --

☑ SamuelWantman 23:59, 22 February 2009 (UTC)[reply

]

I have just modified one external link on Caryl Churchill. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

• Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20140222204659/http://www.playbill.com/news/article/146911-Theater-Hall-of-Fame-Ceremony-Honoring-Linda-Lavin-Brian-Dennehy-Michael-Blakemore-Presented-Jan-24 to http://www.playbill.com/news/article/146911-Theater-Hall-of-Fame-Ceremony-Honoring-Linda-Lavin-Brian-Dennehy-Michael-Blakemore-Presented-Jan-24

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at {{

This message was posted before February 2018.

• If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
• If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 11:23, 16 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Caryl Churchill. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

• Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20090302091920/http://www.palestinecampaign.org/Index5b.asp?m_id=1&l1_id=2&l2_id=12 to http://www.palestinecampaign.org/Index5b.asp?m_id=1&l1_id=2&l2_id=12

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018.

• If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
• If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 16:24, 31 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

The following Wikimedia Commons file used on this page has been nominated for speedy deletion:

• Caryl Churchill (33310309965).jpg

You can see the reason for deletion at the file description page linked above. Community Tech bot (talk) 15:51, 16 July 2018 (UTC)[reply]

I have made some edits to improve this article including one deletion of content as the only reference I could find was a direct copy and it was on a Prezi link that did not cite the author. I believe more work is needed before before the banners identifying problems can be removed.

— Preceding unsigned comment added by Pakoire (talk • contribs) 23:57, 6 April 2020 (UTC)[reply] 

Pakoire (talk) 04:49, 7 April 2020 (UTC) (sorry for not signing)[reply]