Talk:Charles Hedley

This article is rated Start-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects:

Biography: Science and Academia This article is within the scope of WikiProject Biography, a collaborative effort to create, develop and organize Wikipedia's articles about people. All interested editors are invited to join the project and contribute to the discussion. For instructions on how to use this banner, please refer to the documentation.BiographyWikipedia:WikiProject BiographyTemplate:WikiProject Biographybiography articles This article is supported by the science and academia work group. Australia Charles Hedley is within the scope of WikiProject Australia, which aims to improve Wikipedia's coverage of Australia and Australia-related topics. If you would like to participate, visit the project page.AustraliaWikipedia:WikiProject AustraliaTemplate:WikiProject AustraliaAustralia articles ??? This article has not yet received a rating on the project's importance scale. Need help improving this article? Ask a LibrarianWhat's this? at the National Library of Australia. The Wikimedia Australia chapter can be contacted via email to helpwikimedia.org.au for non-editorial assistance. Yorkshire Low‑importance Charles Hedley is within the scope of WikiProject Yorkshire, an attempt to build a comprehensive and detailed guide to Yorkshire on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, you can visit the project page, where you can join the project, see a list of open tasks, and join in discussions on the project's talk page.YorkshireWikipedia:WikiProject YorkshireTemplate:WikiProject YorkshireYorkshire articles Low This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Some suggestions for improvement as the article is expanded:

• Template:Infobox Scientist
  should be added
• Photograph or portrait should be added from a source with a free license, if available
• Lead needs expanding and should emphasise reasons for notability of subject
• Reorganisation to split details of personal life from work might be beneficial
• Information on research should be expanded
• References should be expanded, and preferably converted to the inline format
• External links to useful online resources should be added if available

Espresso Addict 23:40, 13 July 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Clearly this is an established article and should not be deleted. IP user is attempting to have a page deleted and is in turn using the CSD to vandalize Wikipedia --Mr Xaero ^☎️ 18:36, 31 May 2019 (UTC)[reply]