Talk:Chhota Shakeel

A fact from Chhota Shakeel appeared on Wikipedia's Main Page in the Did you know column on 3 March 2019 (check views). The text of the entry was as follows: Did you know... that U.S. citizens are prohibited from engaging in business activities with Chhota Shakeel? A record of the entry may be seen at Wikipedia:Recent additions/2019/March. The nomination discussion and review may be seen at Template:Did you know nominations/Chhota Shakeel.

This article is rated C-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects:

Biography This article is within the scope of WikiProject Biography, a collaborative effort to create, develop and organize Wikipedia's articles about people. All interested editors are invited to join the project and contribute to the discussion. For instructions on how to use this banner, please refer to the documentation.BiographyWikipedia:WikiProject BiographyTemplate:WikiProject Biographybiography articles India: Maharashtra / Mumbai Low‑importance This article is within the scope of WikiProject India, which aims to improve Wikipedia's coverage of India-related topics. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page.IndiaWikipedia:WikiProject IndiaTemplate:WikiProject IndiaIndia articles Low This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale. This article is supported by WikiProject Maharashtra (assessed as Low-importance). This article is supported by WikiProject Mumbai (assessed as Low-importance). This article was last assessed in April 2012. An editor has requested that an image or photograph be added to this article. Crime and Criminal Biography: Organized crime Low‑importance This article is within the scope of WikiProject Crime and Criminal Biography, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Crime and Criminal Biography articles on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Crime and Criminal BiographyWikipedia:WikiProject Crime and Criminal BiographyTemplate:WikiProject Crime and Criminal BiographyCrime-related articles Low This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale. This article is supported by the Organized crime task force (assessed as Low-importance).

This article was automatically assessed because at least one WikiProject had rated the article as stub, and the rating on other projects was brought up to Stub class. BetacommandBot 17:39, 9 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]

All material must be sourced in the article.

Also, I'm putting a tag on the second source since it doesn't look reliable. The website says it is "A RESOURCE CENTER FOR THE PROMOTION OF HINDUTVA", which seems to be a partisan site pushing a certain POV.Bless sins (talk) 05:37, 24 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]

[1] [2] [3] [4] [5] [6] [7]

• @
  MX: I had restored an edit noting his death cited to [8] [9] [10] which I reviewed and thought to be reliable, in this edit, but it looks like I may have hidden my accidentally while cleaning up a copyvio. I see now that two of those sources are actually the same editorial, but are they not suitable? Ivanvector (^Talk/_Edits) 13:18, 6 February 2019 (UTC)[reply
  ]

@

✉ • ✎) 15:17, 6 February 2019 (UTC)[reply

]

• BTW, I think I'm officially done with this article. I don't feel qualified to do more research about the D-Company and its members. Sources above can be used for expansion, but I will get back to working on other articles of mine. I will likely remove this page from my Wathclist after it appears at DYK. Cheers,
  ✉ • ✎) 16:24, 6 February 2019 (UTC)[reply
  ]

For the record, I want to mention we should not claim as an absolute statement of fact that Shakeel is dead unless we find official sources from the governments of India, the U.S., or the Interpol confirming this. The sources that claim he's dead do not address this investigation conducted by India Today that questions his supposed death story. Until then, we should not treat his rumored death as official.

Dear MX,The India Today investigation in itself was a Hoax,they assumed that Shakeel is alive based ONLY on the premise that his voice is alive and that voice never belonged to him but a proxy which has been explained in detail.A man with a Red Corner notice on him cannot be travelling freely all over the work and making calls at will via prepaid sim numbers available in the public domain.The real Chhota Shakeel is actually dead-The ISI is continuing to run him.India or Pak will never declare him dead-for political reasons.Pak till denies he ever lived in Karachi-India does not have the capacity to prove that he did- Catch 22.Only the can.Pakistan is an impossible terrain for the Interpol to run an investigation and you are missing the fact that the rumoured death started off in early 2017 but was confirmed only in 2019 via Ocnus and a Journalist Robert Williamson who used to work with The Boston Globe. There was also a confirmation in 2018 early https://www.oneindia.com/international/chhota-shakeel-is-dead-here-is-the-isis-impersonator-who-runs-the-d-syndicate-now-2611914.html

It is not appropriate to disregard the above article-It clearly states that shakeel is dead. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 106.209.232.225 (talk) 08:07, 9 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]

@MX This confirms his Death please read the paper carefully https://limacharlienews.com/asia/organised-crime-in-asia/ 180.183.219.144 (talk) 12:06, 9 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]

• Dear MX,The India Today investigation in itself was a Hoax,they assumed that Shakeel is alive based ONLY on the premise that his voice is alive and that voice never belonged to him but a proxy which has been explained in detail. – That's actually not true. The source also comments on the letter and the policeman who allegedly signed it. Again, I'm not here to claim whether Shakeel is alive or dead. The problem here is sources contradict each other, and the newer sources you cite that declare him dead are: (1) not an official announcement; (2) don't comment on this India Today investigation. Why should we give
  unfair representation to those versions
  ?

• Pak till denies he ever lived in Karachi – You have a source for this specific claim?

• and you are missing the fact that the rumoured death started off in early 2017 but was confirmed only in 2019 via Ocnus and a Journalist Robert Williamson who used to work with The Boston Globe. – Again, we got no OFFICIAL confirmation from U.S., Indian, or Interpol authorities. Ocnus can claim whatever it wants, but the fact that the India Today investigation stands unchallenged (Ocnus pretty much ignores it) means we will have to go by an official statement.
  ✉ • ✎) 16:22, 9 February 2019 (UTC)[reply
  ]

Post, Newsroom (19 January 2021). "How Dawood empire got destroyed by the same ISI that created it". [[11]].

Navashree, Nandini (15 January 2021). "Dawood In Karachi, Pakistan's ISI Harbouring Chota Shakeel: Arrested Lakdawala". [[12]].

"Former ISI officials confirm the death of Gangster Chhota Shakeel". [[ https://issuu.com]].

Rajendarkhanna (talk) 14:19, 22 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]

I had provided references and cited sources which prove beyond reasonable doubt that the subject on whom the article is based in indeed deceased,however it was overturned because of a personal opintion which stated "That it was not constructive"-Well,in my personal opinion it constructs the entire narrative the way it should be.Admins please check history.{{Admin help}} Edwardblakes (talk) 04:33, 26 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]

policies and guidelines. The sources that you added do not appear to be reliable to me. Which source do you consider most reliable? Cullen328 (talk) 02:53, 27 February 2023 (UTC)[reply

]

https://www.opednews.com/articles/Indian-Mafia-don-Chhota-Sh-by-Ed-Blakes-India-Pakistan-Conflict_Indian-Country-Today-Media-Network_Narco-terrorism_Reporters-210120-4.html Edwardblakes (talk) 10:45, 27 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Terrible, non-

BLP. Nor is the other OneIndia source or the ISUU source reliable. The original reversion, as well as Cullen's objections above, both are correct. JavaHurricane 11:35, 27 February 2023 (UTC)[reply

]