Talk:Chiapas conflict

, the process backfired as much of the surplus Mayan community moved from its traditional areas into the new lands.

1970s Mexico

This section does not cite any sources. Please help improve this section by adding citations to reliable sources. Unsourced material may be challenged and removed. (October 2018) (Learn how and when to remove this message)

As the crisis threatened to grow into rebellion by the mostly European population, and realizing that the ecological ruin caused by the movement wasn't being mitigated by economic prosperity within the Mayan population, the government decided to halt the migration.

To halt the migration, the government decided in 1971 to declare a large part of the forest (614,000 hectares, or 6140 km2), encompassing both the previously unsettled regions and the former Mexican-owned farms, as a protected area: the "Montes Azules Bio-sphere Reserve". They appointed only one small population group (66

1980s–1990s Mexico

Since the 1980s and 1990s, Mexico's economic policy concentrated more on industrial development and attracting foreign capital. However, this policy soon changed to try to brand Mexico as more of an agricultural power, which culminated in the administration of President

WorldsOkayistEditor (talk) 20:30, 11 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This article contains very little information about the Zapatista uprising itself, which should be the main focus. Charles Essie (talk) 02:07, 22 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]

It's odd that the heading includes a death toll, but the article is bloodless - it implies that despite being an armed uprising there was no gunfire. "The rebellion sparked several days of sustained fighting with the federal government, leaving dozens of people dead", according to the BBC. It's as if someone is trying to sanitise the article and present the Zapatistas as a bunch of fun-loving chums who just happen to walk around with rifles. 87.114.47.203 (talk) 00:52, 26 May 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This article is not just about the uprising, but the peacetalks, paramilitary actions, and other conflict since 1994. See the Zapatista uprising page here, I just made it. Perhaps there could be more content but it can be hard to find at times.

There is absolutely no way that this article is neutral. The Media Influence section especially presents the Zapatista forces as being simply Freedom Fighters desiring to end the tyranny of the government. This definitely needs to be addressed. --Stephen C Wells (talk) 18:52, 12 August 2014 (UTC)[reply]

I completely agree, The entire article reads more like a Zapatista press release, than a proper wiki. After reading it, I believe the entire article may need to be rewritten. There is simply a lot of bias here. It seems to go out of it's way to portray the EZLN forces as the "good guys" and those who opposed them as the "bad guys". Like I said, the whole article needs to be looked at, but the Media Influence, Conditions today, and Social programs sections are a good place to start. I recommend deleting the entire Media Inluence section, because as Stephen said, it is one of the most obvious issues. Also I don't see why we even need to have a section called Media influence here, this article is about an armed conflict, not a political party. The other sections I recommend rewriting if necessary. Secureline (talk) 19:15, 12 February 2015 (UTC) — Preceding unsigned comment added by Secureline (talk • contribs) 03:42, 7 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]

I agree with the general suggestion, but not with removing the Media Influence section. That section seems to me like it explains why this article is so skewed: the movement it describes is relatively minor on a global scale, but is good at getting good publicity. If we scrap that info altogether then the average reader has less reason to take the article with a grain of salt. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 2600:8802:5604:E854:8C74:DA3B:D8BA:A949 (talk) 02:35, 13 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 2 external links on Chiapas conflict. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

• Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20120119081719/http://www.sipaz.org/crono/proceng.htm to http://www.sipaz.org/crono/proceng.htm
• Added {{dead link}} tag to http://www.drc-citizenship.org/docs/internships/2002/OM_mexico.pdf
• Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20120119081719/http://www.sipaz.org/crono/proceng.htm to http://www.sipaz.org/crono/proceng.htm

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018.

• If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
• If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 17:14, 4 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This article was the subject of a Wiki Education Foundation-supported course assignment, between 17 January 2022 and 15 May 2022. Further details are available on the course page. Student editor(s): Sponge37 (article contribs).