Talk:Chris Arreola

Page contents not supported in other languages.
Source: Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia.

Untitled

NO UNVERIFIABLE STATISTICS WITHOUT REFERENCES PLEASE. The claim that he is 224 pounds is absurd based on his known weights over the years. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 12.35.79.2 (talk) 22:41, 8 September 2009 (UTC)[reply]

I don't uderstand why you are highlighting his weight so much. 255 pounds, for a 6'4 inch heavyweight isn't ridiculously heavy. YES, IT IS.

I think Lennox Lewis (6'5) weighed in at about 255. NO, HE WEIGHED BETWEEN 240 AND 242 POUNDS. Vitali and Wlad K both normally weigh in at, at least 255. WRONG, THEY ALWAYS WEIGH IN BETWEEN 240 AND 242 POUNDS. Even Roy Jones was 220 when he fought at Heavyweight. NO, HE WEIGHED 193 POUNDS IN HIS ONLY HEAVYWEIGHT FIGHT. Evander Holyfield and Mike Tyson (very small heavys) were around 235 pounds. NO. TYSON WEIGHED BETWEEN 215 AND 218 POUNDS, WHILE EVANDER WEIGHED BETWEEN 208 AND 210 POUNDS.

In short, 255 pounds isn't overweight for a 6'4 heavyweight. If it is, it's not that overweight, and really worth hilighting. IT IS WORTH HIGHLIGHTING, AND IT IS OBESE. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 193.128.223.67 (talk) 17:36, 11 August 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Because he is fat, not solid. The others you list were / are all muscular. Arreola is a tub of goo. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 216.86.220.26 (talk) 18:19, 17 August 2009 (UTC)[reply]

This fanboy article is a joke. Vitali Klitschko is heavily favored, and that isn't even mentioned. Arreola will score a MAJOR upset if he wins. Why does the fanboy tone stay in this article? Even the header states it is from a fan perspective. Is Chris editing this page himself? —Preceding unsigned comment added by 216.86.220.26 (talk) 16:54, 19 August 2009 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 5 external links on Chris Arreola. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at {{

Sourcecheck
}}).

This message was posted before February 2018.

regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check
}} (last update: 18 January 2022).

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 04:06, 23 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]