Talk:Christian Cultural Center

The following discussion is an archived discussion of the proposal. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on the talk page. No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the proposal was moved. --BDD (talk) 18:33, 25 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Unnecessary title disambiguation as the ambiguous title redirects to the title with the disambiguator. Also, there are no other pages currently on the English Wikipedia named "Christian Cultural Center," so it is simply unnecessary for this article's title to include the disambiguator "Brooklyn". Steel1943 (talk) 02:24, 9 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]

• There are many establishments across the world that could be described as a Christian cultural center or centre. Anthony Appleyard (talk) 06:46, 9 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]

What you seem to be referring to is some sort of generic term in regards to what someone might refer to their cultural center. Since all of the words in this title are capital, the title should refer to a place/company that is specifically named as such: at the present time, as I had stated in the previous note, there are currently no other articles on Wikipedia that have the name "Christian Cultural Center" (or Centre). This move should be a task to remove necessary disambiguation to this article's title. This article was moved from Christian Cultural Center back in 2010 [1] for "creating a disambiguation page": this disambiguation page was never created. Steel1943 (talk) 07:04, 9 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]

• Oppose - Christian Cultural Center should likely be developed into an article on Christian Cultural Centers...this article, the Brooklyn congregation using the name, doesn't pass my reading of the notability test and would be a great AFD candidate. Maybe it's just the lack of in depth sources (on NYT article isn't sufficient coverage, IMHO), or the stubbiness of this article.--
  talk) 08:09, 9 March 2014 (UTC)[reply
  ]
  • Get to work then. Otherwise, it's just
    christian cultural center (lowercase). —  AjaxSmack  16:35, 15 March 2014 (UTC)[reply
    ]

• Discussion opened by IP editor at WP:Christianity noticeboard but I would lean Support (AfD-worthiness of subject article notwithstanding) unless discussion reveals existence of actual (notable) institutions which refer to themselves as such, or significant coverage which uses this as a general term. Roberticus talk 14:12, 9 March 2014 (UTC) a close e[reply]

• Support for procedural reasons (to revert to the original title) and on the merits (unnecessary disambiguation). According to most interpretations of Wikipedia policy,
  potential future article should not prevent this move. —  AjaxSmack  16:35, 15 March 2014 (UTC)[reply
  ]

• Oppose - agree with Colonel Henry. And would support AFD - ie, notability has not been established; only two sources cited (one being the organization's own website) in an article existing for 7 years; most of the article's text is about the pastor, not the organization. Dezastru (talk) 17:20, 25 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the proposal. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on this talk page. No further edits should be made to this section.