Talk:Citron-crested cockatoo

This article is rated Start-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects:

Birds Mid‑importance Mid This article has been rated as Mid-importance on the project's importance scale. WikiProject Birds To-do: edit history watch purge Here are some tasks awaiting attention: Wikify : Ninox boobook ocellata • The Institute for Bird Populations (more) Other : Add photos to bird articles needing photos (search Flickr for free images ). Add taxonomic authorities to genus articles. More outstanding tasks at the project's cleanup listing, Category:Birds articles needing attention, and Wikipedia:WikiProject Birds/Todo. Indonesia Low‑importance This article is within the scope of WikiProject Indonesia, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Indonesia and Indonesia-related topics on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.IndonesiaWikipedia:WikiProject IndonesiaTemplate:WikiProject IndonesiaIndonesia articles Low This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

I took the picture from the German wikipedia and put it in the article. To upload a picture, click on "Upload file" in the toolbox on the left side of your browser window. Tomer^talk 07:31, 13 January 2006 (UTC)[reply]

I guess that the picture is a male citron crested cockatoo, because it has black eyes and rather a broad beak.

There is a section on the wiki for aviculture. From one point of view, aviculture (birds in breeding programs and as pets) may clutter the section on the natural science of the birds and alternatively, from another point of view, this is acceptable. The wiki natural science and aviculture pages already have many interlinks, but it is not clear where species specific aviculture pages should go. Is there a wiki approved satisfatory format for this? The avoculture section could extend to become a useful resourse, if it is facilitated. In the future many birds will (sadly) become rarer and so extensive knowledge of birds in aviculture may help to save the species for reintroduction to the wild. Similarly, other animals could have similar interlinking.

I think the best place to take this up would be at WikiProject Birds, a project you might wish to join. Cheers. Tomer^talk 22:44, 23 January 2006 (UTC)[reply]

This project idea put foreward today for discussion on the wikiproject birds talk page 23 Jan 2006.

Which particular part of the page is in dispute?

There's a hidden note (HTML comment) on the page. Subsequent edits have somewhat mootified it since I originally wrote it. Tomer^talk 21:52, 29 January 2006 (UTC)[reply]

This article was automatically assessed because at least one WikiProject had rated the article as start, and the rating on other projects was brought up to start class. BetacommandBot 20:43, 9 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Should "Yellow-crested Cockatoo" and "Citron-crested Cockatoo" be on the same page? Are these two birds subspecies of the same species? Snowman (talk) 18:13, 12 June 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Citron-crested cockatoo. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

• Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20060516082108/http://www.rspb.org.uk:80/birds/advice/endangeredspecies/threats.asp to http://www.rspb.org.uk/birds/advice/endangeredspecies/threats.asp

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at {{

This message was posted before February 2018.

• If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
• If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 08:30, 25 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]