Talk:Clive Granger

This  level-5 vital article is rated Start-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects:

Biography: Science and Academia This article is within the scope of WikiProject Biography, a collaborative effort to create, develop and organize Wikipedia's articles about people. All interested editors are invited to join the project and contribute to the discussion. For instructions on how to use this banner, please refer to the documentation.BiographyWikipedia:WikiProject BiographyTemplate:WikiProject Biographybiography articles This article is supported by the science and academia work group. Economics High‑importance This article is within the scope of WikiProject Economics, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Economics on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.EconomicsWikipedia:WikiProject EconomicsTemplate:WikiProject EconomicsEconomics articles High This article has been rated as High-importance on the project's importance scale.

This article was automatically assessed because at least one article was rated and this bot brought all the other ratings up to at least that level. BetacommandBot 11:06, 27 August 2007 (UTC)[reply]

He can't have been inducted into the order of knights bachelor as the whole point of a knights bachelor is that they do not belong to a chivalric order. 129.67.158.52 12:42, 9 October 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Rephrased. Is it OK now? AdamSmithee 06:47, 10 October 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Welsh how is he welsh ? —Preceding unsigned comment added by 134.219.100.142 (talk) 16:25, 7 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]

I'm not sure about this, either - he was born there, but left a year later and says he has no memories of it. I'm not sure if he considers himself Welsh, but I certainly can't find a reference to him doing so; I'm going to change it to the more generic UK/British pending some explicit answer.

talk | 09:40, 22 October 2008 (UTC)[reply

]

Granger's field is similar/same as that of this year's Nobel winners Thomas Sargeant and Christopher Sims. The article should at least describe the method for which Granger was awarded the Nobel... e.g., Granger Causality. Two or more time series might appear to be related without demonstrating causality of one over the other. A time series is said to “Granger-cause” another if its past values improve the prediction one would get just from the past values of the first time series. Granger causality is related to cointegration. Granger and Engle demonstrated that when two variables are cointegrated, then at least one of them must Granger-cause the other. The first important application of Granger-causality to economics appears in a 1972 article by Christopher Sims (the same as the Nobel awardee!) in which he showed that money Granger-causes nominal GNP, apparently bolstering the monetarist idea that fluctuations in money are the major cause of business cycles. Apparent lack of Granger Causality is one of the complaints against the model of anthropomorphic global warming i.e., lack of causality demonstrated in studying cointegration between CO2 and temperature rise or fall on millennial time scales. In most all cases movement of temperature leads changes in CO2 concentration based on proxy measures.Danleywolfe (talk) 11:41, 11 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]

I have seen absolutely no evidence that Clive Granger is a post-Keynesian, having read much of his literature. He is an econometrician, not a macroeconomist, until a citation is provided of Granger being a post-Keynesian that description should be removed. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 137.205.131.50 (talk) 16:25, 29 August 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Clive Granger. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

• Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20070709153435/http://www.econ.canterbury.ac.nz/sir_clive.shtml to http://www.econ.canterbury.ac.nz/sir_clive.shtml

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018.

• If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
• If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 15:33, 9 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]