Talk:ColdFusion Markup Language
This is the talk page for discussing improvements to the ColdFusion Markup Language article. This is not a forum for general discussion of the article's subject. |
Article policies
|
Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL |
This article is rated Start-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | |||||||||||
|
On merging Features section from ColdFusion to ColdFusion Markup Language
As chair of the CFML Advisory Committee, I want to address the suggestion of merging the features section from the
Once the committee has published its specification of core vs vendor-specific language features (which should happen by the end of 2008), we can start to expend the CFML page to cover core language and ensure that other vendor-specific pages refer to the core CFML page as well as providing documentation of their own extensions on their own pages. Seancorfield (talk) 18:14, 28 August 2008 (UTC)
This seems like a very good approach, and I wholeheartedly agree. 128.250.176.68 (talk) 06:49, 4 December 2008 (UTC)
Could the website be dropped because thats the Adobe CF Site, the railo and BD sites are not linked. Not having this would be the ideal. Also the developer section could well do with being dropped? —Preceding unsigned comment added by 62.172.76.131 (talk) 09:31, 5 December 2008 (UTC)
I would say that a shake up of the pages is needed , but I think we need to remember that ColdFusion and CFML are, as subjects (despite being linked ) two separate entities, ColdFusion as a server side Programming Language(CFML) and the web technology that powers it, i think that it should be a single (or linked) page with references and titles exlaining wyhich sections are dealing with which area.- James Crawford —Preceding unsigned comment added by 89.243.49.98 (talk) 10:32, 16 December 2008 (UTC)
- This article should cover the CFML language (syntax,semantics,etc) and nothing else. The history section should be dropped (information there belongs in the respective engine's pages). The rest of the page needs a complete overhaul, and in particular should be giving equal footing to script syntax (which currently is briefly mentioned then forgotton about). I added a link to Mike Henke's "CFML in 100 minutes" tutorial, because that's currently a far better representation of CFML than this page (although it is a tutorial, rather than an encylopaedic article, which is what this page needs to become). -- Peter Boughton (talk) 15:43, 2 October 2011 (UTC)
External links modified
Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just added archive links to 2 external links on
- Added archive https://web.archive.org/20080324005624/http://livedocs.adobe.com:80/coldfusion/6.1/htmldocs/element4.htm to http://livedocs.adobe.com/coldfusion/6.1/htmldocs/element4.htm
- Added archive https://web.archive.org/20080527095947/http://livedocs.adobe.com:80/coldfusion/6.1/htmldocs/element5.htm to http://livedocs.adobe.com/coldfusion/6.1/htmldocs/element5.htm
When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true to let others know.
This message was posted before February 2018.
{{source check
- If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
- If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.
Cheers.—
"Cfml" listed at Redirects for discussion
A discussion is taking place to address the redirect
"CFML" listed at Redirects for discussion
A discussion is taking place to address the redirect