Talk:Collegium Maius, Kraków

	Poland portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Poland, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Poland on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.PolandWikipedia:WikiProject PolandTemplate:WikiProject PolandPoland articles
???	This article has not yet received a rating on the project's importance scale.

article guideline

for useful advice.Higher educationWikipedia:WikiProject Higher educationTemplate:WikiProject Higher educationHigher education articles

Architecture

	Architecture portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Architecture, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Architecture on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.ArchitectureWikipedia:WikiProject ArchitectureTemplate:WikiProject ArchitectureArchitecture articles
???	This article has not yet received a rating on the project's importance scale.

Is there any evidence for the usage of the Polish name "Akademia Krakowska" ? I belive a latin name was used in the Middle Ages. Kameal (talk) 09:42, 18 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Probably both were used: Academia cracoviensis (Latin), and Akademia krakowska (Polish). Nihil novi (talk) 11:25, 18 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just added archive links to one external link on

nobots

|deny=InternetArchiveBot}} to keep me off the page altogether. I made the following changes:

Added archive https://web.archive.org/20061228110521/http://www3.uj.edu.pl:80/Muzeum/history.en.html to http://www3.uj.edu.pl/Muzeum/history.en.html

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true to let others know.

This message was posted before February 2018.

regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check

}} (last update: 18 January 2022).

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—

Talk to my owner:Online 19:01, 20 February 2016 (UTC)[reply

]

I have stumbled on hundreds of photographes with watermarks from Malopolska whatever it is. While it is of course better with as many pictures as possible in an article, this is still annoying. If I like the photo I can always check who has made it. Can we ask such contributors to remove unnecessary watermarks? Besides it can never be good marketing but I do not want to waste my time explaining. It is just wrong. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Vladimir Timakov (talk • contribs) 11:45, 24 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]