Talk:Colm O'Gorman

Page contents not supported in other languages.
Source: Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia.

"He is Gay"

I'm utterly new to editing wikipedia so apologies if I do this wrong as I don't know what to do with the references. Anyway introduction has squashed on the end 'he is gay' with two references. This seems utterly out of place; would one ever right at the end of a heterosexuals introduction "he is straight"? Going to remove it, but I don't know how to correct the two references which will be orphaned. BeardedChimp (talk) 10:11, 24 May 2009 (UTC)[reply]

I think I've done that right, I deleted the two references that followed the text, I hope that was the best way to do it. BeardedChimp (talk) 10:16, 24 May 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Nuncio or Pope?

Did he sue the nuncio, as currently stated, or the Pope himself? Here it says it was the Pope :/ Malick78 (talk) 22:58, 25 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Colm O'Gorman. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018.

regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check
}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 20:53, 4 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Colm O'Gorman. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018.

regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check
}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 19:29, 10 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

"Views and controversies" section and other edits

WP:MANDY position for the director of Amnesty International, one would think. BastunĖġáḍβáś₮ŭŃ! 21:50, 11 April 2021 (UTC)[reply
]

It isn't my opinion. It was reported as a illegal in the Irish Times. My bad on using in correct citation https://www.irishtimes.com/news/politics/amnesty-international-ordered-t:o-return-donation-from-billionaire-george-soros-1.3320638. Gript meets standard journalistic standardsAerchasúr (talk) 22:16, 11 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]
No, it is your opinion. The word "illegal" is not used in either the Indo article you previously cited in the article, or in the Irish Times article you now claim says it was illegal. There was a legal dispute, which is a different thing. This was heard in the High Court in 2018, and involved Amnesty International and SIPO, not O'Gorman directly, who was only involved in his Amnesty role. Why would we include this in his BLP? I mean, I suppose we could include it, if it was neutrally worded, and we mention that Amnesty won the case? Once again, it has already been discussed, but gript is not regarded as a reliable source on Wikipedia. BastunĖġáḍβáś₮ŭŃ! 22:33, 11 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Gript meets all WP policy such as

WP:BLP. Aerchasúr (talk) 01:27, 13 April 2021 (UTC)[reply
]

Correct, Alison - question asked and answered here. Aerchasúr is aware of this now, so hopefully will stop adding it to articles. BastunĖġáḍβáś₮ŭŃ! 11:20, 13 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]

That isnt correct. It meets

WP:RS. This deleted ion is a clear case of WP:IDONTLIKETHAT The notice board discussion of Gript isn't credible. It lists bogus objections to its reliability such as that it is anti abortion. Aerchasúr (talk) 14:23, 13 April 2021 (UTC)[reply
]

You might want to make the above arguments at the
Reliable Souces Noticeboard as you seek to have it close down, so. BastunĖġáḍβáś₮ŭŃ! 14:28, 13 April 2021 (UTC)[reply
]