Talk:DSB (railway company)

DSB (railway company) was one of the Engineering and technology good articles, but it has been removed from the list. There are suggestions below for improving the article to meet the good article criteria. Once these issues have been addressed, the article can be renominated. Editors may also seek a reassessment of the decision if they believe there was a mistake.

Article milestones
Date	Process	Result
December 13, 2005	Good article nominee	Listed
April 27, 2008	Good article reassessment	Delisted

Current status: Delisted good article

Denmark High‑importance

	Denmark portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Denmark, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Denmark on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.DenmarkWikipedia:WikiProject DenmarkTemplate:WikiProject DenmarkDenmark articles
High	This article has been rated as High-importance on the project's importance scale.

Trains High‑importance

	Trains Portal
DYK	April 17, 2009
Sel	week 15, 2006

This article is within the scope of WikiProject Trains, an attempt to build a comprehensive and detailed guide to rail transport on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, you can visit the project page, where you can join the project and/or contribute to the discussion. See also: WikiProject Trains to do list and the Trains Portal.TrainsWikipedia:WikiProject TrainsTemplate:WikiProject Trainsrail transport articles

High

This article has been rated as High-importance on the project's importance scale.

GA Re-Review and In-line citations

Members of the

verification and reference criteria. Currently this article does not include in-line citations. It is recommended that the article's editors take a look at the inclusion of in-line citations as well as how the article stacks up against the rest of the Good Article criteria. GA reviewers will give you at least a week's time from the date of this notice to work on the in-line citations before doing a full re-review and deciding if the article still merits being considered a Good Article or would need to be de-listed. If you have any questions, please don't hesitate to contact us on the Good Article project talk page or you may contact me personally. On behalf of the Good Articles Project, I want to thank you for all the time and effort that you have put into working on this article and improving the overall quality of the Wikipedia project. LuciferMorgan 00:20, 13 December 2006 (UTC)[reply

]

The above message looks like a boiler plate (forgive the pun!). To be honest, in the case of this article, lack of inline citation is not the main issue: the article has absolutely no secondary sources, which are essential for an encyclopedia article. Geometry guy 22:10, 27 April 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Moved

I've moved the article from

Danske Statsbaner to DSB (railway company), and I'm afraid it's a bit long overdue. The name "Danske Statsbaner" is never used in any non-historical context on their website, and the Danish CVR register of businesses has only the name "DSB" registered. The "Danske Statsbaner" name probably disappeared with the restructuring in the 1990s, though I can't find any source to directly support this. — Peter L <talk|contribs> 19:21, 18 November 2008 (UTC)[reply

]

Oresund bridge

A knowledgeable contributor should add info about the

Oresund bridge and the extension of DSB services into Sweden. Folks at 137 (talk) 09:52, 6 August 2011 (UTC)[reply

]

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 2 external links on DSB (railway company). Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018.

regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check

}} (last update: 18 January 2022).

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 02:12, 3 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]