Talk:Dark-sky preserve

Astronomy Mid‑importance

	Astronomy portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Astronomy, which collaborates on articles related to Astronomy on Wikipedia.AstronomyWikipedia:WikiProject AstronomyTemplate:WikiProject AstronomyAstronomy articles
Mid	This article has been rated as Mid-importance on the project's importance scale.

Environment Low‑importance

	Wikipedia:Contributing FAQ and leave any messages at the project talk page.EnvironmentWikipedia:WikiProject EnvironmentTemplate:WikiProject EnvironmentEnvironment articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Protected areas Mid‑importance

	This article is part of WikiProject Protected areas, a WikiProject related to national parks and other protected natural or ecological areas worldwide.Protected areasWikipedia:WikiProject Protected areasTemplate:WikiProject Protected areasProtected areas articles
Mid	This article has been rated as Mid-importance on the project's importance scale.

improve its quality

.

Aoraki MacKenzie night sky reserve size

Aoraki MacKenzie night sky reserve size is not 4300 km in radius, but 4300 square kilometers. ^[1] page 9 shows the map of the area. Since it might be that all the other reserve sizes are measured in radius of the area, I didn't edit the chart, but right now the information is wrong. The radius is more like 40km than 4300 km.

109.240.48.160 (talk) 20:16, 22 August 2016 (UTC) dml[reply]

References

^ http://ida.darksky.org/assets/Night_Sky_Conservation/New_Zealand_IDSP_app.pdf

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 3 external links on Dark-sky preserve. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at {{

Sourcecheck

}}).

This message was posted before February 2018.

regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check

}} (last update: 18 January 2022).

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 22:18, 6 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 4 external links on Dark-sky preserve. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20081115023700/http://data.nextrionet.com/site/idsa/PR_Natural_Bridges_2007.pdf to http://data.nextrionet.com/site/idsa/PR_Natural_Bridges_2007.pdf
Corrected formatting/usage for http://www.darksky.org/assets/documents/CCNHP_Intl_Dark_Sky_Park_Application.pdf
Corrected formatting/usage for http://www.darksky.org/assets/documents/IDAChacoPR.pdf
Corrected formatting/usage for http://docs.darksky.org/PR/IDA_Aoraki_Mackenzie_PR.pdf

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018.

regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check

}} (last update: 18 January 2022).

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 21:37, 4 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

DailyMail: "Idaho plans to open the first Dark Sky Reserve in the U.S."

This is something for regular contributors to this Wiki article to watch: http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-4888326/Stargazers-eye-nations-dark-sky-reserve-Idaho.html

It says they plan to apply this fall and expect the approval process to take about 10 weeks after the application is submitted. Phantom in ca (talk) 06:26, 19 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This has since happened and been added to the article. -- Beland (talk) 07:39, 18 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified (January 2018)

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 6 external links on Dark-sky preserve. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018.

regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check

}} (last update: 18 January 2022).

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 21:35, 25 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Tone that sounds like opinion

This section in the intro does not sound authoritative. It sounds rhetorical, like the writer is making an argument to convince the reader of something:

“A dark night sky is associated with so many facets of history, philosophy, religion, societal development, poetry, song, mathematics, and science.[2] Hence, the preservation of a DSP is necessary to understand our environmental history.”

The second claim does not have a source either. Can we find one to support this? 151.192.80.101 (talk) 03:15, 12 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]

[1] ttp://ida.darksky.org/assets/Night_Sky_Conservation/New_Zealand_IDSP_app.pdf

[1]