Talk:Dark lord

The following is a closed discussion of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on the talk page. Editors desiring to contest the closing decision should consider a move review. No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the move request was: consensus to move the pages, per the discussion below. Most of the usages on this page imply capitalization, so I have retained it per the request, but please feel free to initiate a new request to remove the caps if that's found to be necessary. Dekimasuよ! 01:13, 9 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]

• Dark Lord (fiction) → Dark Lord
• Dark Lord → Dark Lord (disambiguation)

• Support, but do we really need both pages?. There's a lot of overlap, with the (fiction) article already containing a list of "Dark Lords", same as the current flat DAB page. I dunno, maybe if the new (disambiguation) page could be paired down to just the topics that are literally called "Dark Lord", it can stay. -- Netoholic @ 02:06, 2 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]
• Support, the archetype is the clear primary topic of the term. bd2412 T 04:27, 5 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]
• Support, but move to Dark lord. -- Necrothesp (talk) 14:28, 7 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on this talk page or in a move review. No further edits should be made to this section.

The following is a closed discussion of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on the talk page. Editors desiring to contest the closing decision should consider a move review after discussing it on the closer's talk page. No further edits should be made to this section.

It was proposed in this section that Dark Lord be renamed and moved to Dark lord . result: Moved. Consensus to move to sentence case title. (closed by non-admin page mover) -2pou (talk) 06:24, 29 June 2021 (UTC)[reply] Links: current log • target log This is template {{subst:Requested move/end}}

This is a contested technical request (permalink). Anthony Appleyard (talk) 23:13, 20 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]

• @
  Lord Belbury: queried move request Anthony Appleyard (talk) 23:14, 20 June 2021 (UTC)[reply
  ]
• @
  Lord Belbury: I don't think you meant to place your request directly into the contested section, but now that it's here anyway - it's not obvious to me that a majority of sources use "dark lord" and not "Dark Lord" (I can't access the cited sources and there's not a lot to find online). Title and usage in body should be consistent, but maybe it's the capitalised version that should be used consistently, I can't tell. So I suggest a formal RM. Lennart97 (talk) 21:44, 20 June 2021 (UTC)[reply
  ]
  • Thanks, yes, that was placed by mistake. If this needs more discussion, I'd add that lowercase is in line with similar entries in
    talk) 08:14, 21 June 2021 (UTC)[reply
    ]
• Support Yes, it is difficult to tell what reliable sources say on capitalization, so we should default to English grammatical rules: "dark lord" isn't really a formal title or a proper noun (when used in the generic sense), so it shouldn't be capitalized. If someone were to find evidence that "Dark Lord" is the
  WP:COMMONNAME, I would oppose this move. This ngram might have convinced me to oppose the move, but I know that the results are probably tainted with references to specific dark lords in fiction (who, individually, would likely have capitalized titles).  Mysterymanblue  07:45, 21 June 2021 (UTC)[reply
  ]
• Support per the arguments above. Lennart97 (talk) 14:02, 27 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]