Talk:David Nutt

A fact from David Nutt appeared on Wikipedia's Main Page in the Did you know column on 8 November 2009 (check views). The text of the entry was as follows: Did you know... that in a scientific paper, Equasy, horse riding? A record of the entry may be seen at Wikipedia:Recent additions/2009/November.

This article is rated B-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to multiple WikiProjects.

Altered States of Consciousness This article is within the scope of WikiProject Altered States of Consciousness, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of altered states of consciousness on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Altered States of ConsciousnessWikipedia:WikiProject Altered States of ConsciousnessTemplate:WikiProject Altered States of ConsciousnessAltered States of Consciousness articles ??? This article has not yet received a rating on the project's importance scale. Biography: Science and Academia This article is within the scope of WikiProject Biography, a collaborative effort to create, develop and organize Wikipedia's articles about people. All interested editors are invited to join the project and contribute to the discussion. For instructions on how to use this banner, please refer to the documentation.BiographyWikipedia:WikiProject BiographyTemplate:WikiProject Biographybiography articles This article is supported by the science and academia work group. Medicine: Society / Psychiatry Low‑importance This article is within the scope of WikiProject Medicine, which recommends that medicine-related articles follow the Manual of Style for medicine-related articles and that biomedical information in any article use high-quality medical sources. Please visit the project page for details or ask questions at Wikipedia talk:WikiProject Medicine.MedicineWikipedia:WikiProject MedicineTemplate:WikiProject Medicinemedicine articles Low This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale. This article is supported by the Society and Medicine task force (assessed as Low-importance). This article is supported by the Psychiatry task force. Neuroscience This article is within the scope of WikiProject Neuroscience, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Neuroscience on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.NeuroscienceWikipedia:WikiProject NeuroscienceTemplate:WikiProject Neuroscienceneuroscience articles ??? This article has not yet received a rating on the project's importance scale. Pharmacology Low‑importance This article is within the scope of WikiProject Pharmacology, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Pharmacology on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.PharmacologyWikipedia:WikiProject PharmacologyTemplate:WikiProject Pharmacologypharmacology articles Low This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale. defunct .Psychoactive and Recreational DrugsWikipedia:WikiProject Psychoactive and Recreational DrugsTemplate:WikiProject Psychoactive and Recreational DrugsPsychoactive and Recreational Drugs articles

Science

This article is within the scope of WikiProject Science, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Science on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.ScienceWikipedia:WikiProject ScienceTemplate:WikiProject Sciencescience articles ??? This article has not yet received a rating on the project's importance scale.

Science Policy

This article is within the scope of WikiProject Science Policy, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Science policy on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Science PolicyWikipedia:WikiProject Science PolicyTemplate:WikiProject Science PolicyScience Policy articles ??? This article has not yet received a rating on the project's importance scale.

The contents of the MEAI page were merged into David Nutt. For the contribution history and old versions of the redirected page, please see its history; for the discussion at that location, see its talk page.

The contents of the Equasy page were merged into David Nutt. For the contribution history and old versions of the redirected page, please see its history; for the discussion at that location, see its talk page.

An article that's already been written

Thanks for that, I've added the info from User:Trident13/DNutt and will add some more of these refs. Smartse (talk) 17:14, 3 November 2009 (UTC)[reply]

I've nominated this article for inclusion in the DYK section of the main page. The nominated hook is

Lots of grammar issues in need of fixing. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 47.54.58.166 (talk) 04:49, 29 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just added archive links to one external link on

• Attempted to fix sourcing for http://timesonline.typepad.com/science/2009/11/david-nutts-controversial-lecture-conformed-to-government-guidelines.html

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at {{

Y An editor has reviewed this edit and fixed any errors that were found.

• If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
• If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—

I have just modified one external link on David Nutt. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

• Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20160302032229/http://www.europeanbraincouncil.org/about-us/officers.asp to http://www.europeanbraincouncil.org/about-us/officers.asp

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

Y An editor has reviewed this edit and fixed any errors that were found.

• If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
• If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 08:41, 6 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Has David Nutt retired? Thanks. Martinevans123 (talk) 18:27, 29 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Don't know and don't really care ... he could still have some other current occupation ... I just heard him on the British commercial wireless (radio) earlier this PM, this is not what we really talking about ... the point is, here in the United Kingdom, a neuropsychopharmacologist is a kind of a doctor which specialises in a special field of psychopharmacology, and is a 'regulated profession'. According to the GMC's (General Medical Council) website's Register section [13], Prof Nutt no longer has a 'licence to practice' as of 28.06.2017, therefore he is not a doctor, therefore he is not and cannot be a current or practising psychopharmacologist. Comprendre?! --- 87.102.116.36 (talk) 18:44, 29 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]

I think Wikipedia may have a different definition of europsychopharmacologist to the one enforced by the GMC. And I don't see the word "practicing" anywhere in the article? Martinevans123 (talk) 18:47, 29 April 2018 (UTC) p.s. are you sure you aren't looking for le French wiki?[reply]

Are you stoned?! Oh dear, oh dear, Wikipedia's definition of a neuropsychopharmacologist?! Never mind, feel free to revert away! -- 87.102.116.36 (talk) 18:55, 29 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Neuropsychopharmacology is a scientific discipline - for example one can earn a PhD in that field. It is also something that psychiatrists take into account in their medical practices as MDs. The article does not say anywhere that he is practicing medicine or psychiatry. Jytdog (talk) 19:02, 29 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Sorry, I have keyboard issues. I'm just stoed. Martinevans123 (talk) 19:08, 29 April 2018 (UTC) p.s. thanks, that's the nicest question anyone has asked me all day. But hey, at least I'm not "off my tits on smack". [reply]

So, is that it? You're arguing that because, in your view, "a neuropsychopharmacologist is a kind of a doctor", that only those who are currently medical practitioners can be described as neuropsychopharmacologists? Nutt has worked as a clinical scientist, but has he ever been registered as a medical practitioner with the GMC? Can you show us when he was last registered? Isn't it a bit like asking "when did you stop being a idiot"? Thanks. Martinevans123 (talk) 20:13, 29 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]

not sure who you are responding to, due to your indenting, but if you go to the site the IP mentioned in their edit note -- https://webcache.gmc-uk.org/gmclrmp_enu/start.swe and put in his name or his number (GMC No: 2251774) you will see that it says

Provisional Registration Date -- 18 Jul 1975

Full Registration Date -- 30 Sep 1976

Specialist Register entry date

General psychiatry From 01 Jul 1996 but is not currently licensed to practise

Psychopharmacology From 01 Jul 1996 but is not currently licensed to practise

GP Register entry date -- This doctor is not on the GP Register

So he was registered to practice medicine but his registration has lapsed. It doesn't say when it lapsed. (it is a bummer that the site doesn't create a permalink) I looked briefly for refs actually discussing him practicing medicine and when and why he stopped but didn't find any; if they are out there, this would be fine to include.

We should not do anything now as we don't have good sources for him practicing or not. there are lots of refs about him as a scientist. Jytdog (talk) 21:13, 29 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for adding. That's now a lot clearer. But I'm still not sure that Wikipedia requires GMC registration under General psychiatry, under Psychopharmacology or as a GP, for a subject to be described as a neuropsychopharmacologist? Martinevans123 (talk) 21:25, 29 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]

The IP has a good point, that we should not lead the reader to think we practices medicine and that is why i removed "psychiatrist". There are plenty of sources for him as a neuropsychpharm scientist. The current first couple of sentences make him sound very much like a scientist; not a doctor. Jytdog (talk) 21:33, 29 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]

I thought the IP's only point was to insert "former", which I don't agree with. I agree he's more of a scientist than a practitioner, and certainly not what most people would call "a doctor". Martinevans123 (talk) 21:47, 29 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]

It seems from the above that he's still a doctor, registered with the GMC, but doesn't currently have an up to date licence for clinical practice in any specialty. This would be fairly normal for an academic doctor who doesn't actually do any clinical practice. I hope this helps. Richard Keatinge (talk) 09:44, 14 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Yes, thanks, Richard. That is also exactly my understanding. Martinevans123 (talk) 09:47, 14 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This neologism does not seem notable on its own, but would fit nicely into David_Nutt#Government_positions. Would welcome any thoughts. AleatoryPonderings (talk) 21:37, 14 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]

• Support I don't see any coverage of the word apart from discussions of his usage of it.
  π, ν) 06:02, 16 September 2020 (UTC)[reply
  ]

   Done. Thanks for weighing in,

  Power~enwiki—{{Merge}} and its variants often just languish without anything being done about them, so it was nice to get some input from the community :) AleatoryPonderings (talk) 18:07, 1 October 2020 (UTC)[reply

  ]

• David Nutt Headshot.jpg

You can see the reason for deletion at the file description page linked above. —Community Tech bot (talk) 17:08, 14 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]

I drink 1/3 of a large bottle of vodka daily for 44 years, still here. Cant stop. What can I do? 2603:6000:8D47:121E:9C35:B0BB:1DFF:2910 (talk) 21:31, 26 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]