Talk:De re metallica

This article is rated Start-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects:

Books Stub‑class Technology This article is within the scope of WikiProject Technology, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of technology on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.TechnologyWikipedia:WikiProject TechnologyTemplate:WikiProject TechnologyTechnology articles Mining High‑importance This article is within the scope of WikiProject Mining, a collaborative project to organize and improve articles related to mining and mineral industries. If you would like to participate, you can edit the attached article, or visit the project page, where you can see a list of open tasks, join in the discussion, or join the project.MiningWikipedia:WikiProject MiningTemplate:WikiProject MiningMining articles High This article has been rated as High-importance on the project's importance scale. History of Science High‑importance This article is part of the History of Science WikiProject, an attempt to improve and organize the history of science content on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, you can edit the article attached to this page, or visit the project page, where you can join the project and/or contribute to the discussion. You can also help with the History of Science Collaboration of the Month.History of ScienceWikipedia:WikiProject History of ScienceTemplate:WikiProject History of Sciencehistory of science articles High This article has been rated as High-importance on the project's importance scale.

Should the title be written as De re metallica or De Re Metallica? I don't know. -- Astrochemist (talk) 01:15, 28 May 2008 (UTC)[reply]

I have always seen it as De Re Metallica, as in the Dover edition by Herbert Hoover and his wife. The article could do with some expansion, and inclusion of some more of his amazing woodcuts. Peterlewis (talk) 05:01, 28 May 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just added archive links to one external link on

• Added archive https://web.archive.org/20070919223615/http://www.farlang.com:80/gemstones/agricola-metallica/page_001 to http://www.farlang.com/gemstones/agricola-metallica/page_001

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true to let others know.

This message was posted before February 2018.

• If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
• If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—

I've been reading through this translation of De Re Metallica, and coming back here now I noticed the image captioned "Underground ore crusher, in an undated, hand-colored woodcut" is actually a machine listed in the book as a "rag and chain" pump (Book VI). "The third of this kind" as Georgius refers to it. I'll correct the caption.

However, there is a picture for an ore crusher in Book VIII that this image could be replaced by and preserve the caption's intent, though I do not know it it wold be legal to use the one I linked to as is. 2A0C:5A81:8706:9400:C1A9:7492:51B7:BB9 (talk) 07:01, 13 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

According to [https://www.deepl.com/en/translator#de/en/bauer Deepli itranslate ] builder is an alternative translation of bauer. Peter Horn User talk 14:57, 25 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]