Talk:Dewan Negara

This article is rated C-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects:

Malaysia High‑importance This article is within the scope of WikiProject Malaysia, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Malaysia and Malaysia-related topics on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.MalaysiaWikipedia:WikiProject MalaysiaTemplate:WikiProject MalaysiaMalaysia articles High This article has been rated as High-importance on the project's importance scale. Politics Low‑importance This article is within the scope of WikiProject Politics, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of politics on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.PoliticsWikipedia:WikiProject PoliticsTemplate:WikiProject Politicspolitics articles Low This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

This doesn't deserve its own article. joturner 22:29, 9 February 2006 (UTC)[reply]

I hate to use the systemic bias reply, which is overused IMO, but if Senate of Barbados or Senate of Zimbabwe get their own articles, why can't the Malaysian one? If the argument is that the article duplicates some of Parliament of Malaysia's content, well, the article will have to be broken out in the future, making the merge pointless. Johnleemk | Talk 10:45, 10 February 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Take a look at http://www.senat.fr/senatsdumonde/english/malaisie.html. The similarities aren't an accident. __earth 08:21, 22 December 2005 (UTC)[reply]

NWill moved page "Dewan Negara" to "Senate (Malaysia)" without discussion. Do the regular editors of this article agree or disagree with this move? If there is agreement for the move, then I suggest a further move to "Senate of Malaysia" so the the article name can be linked without piping. If editors prefer the original name, it should be moved back. Ground Zero | t 17:50, 30 December 2012 (UTC)[reply]

The move was part of a massive "campaign" which led to NWill being temporarily blocked. As the move was controversial as well as undiscussed, I have reverted it. If anyone thinks there is a case for renaming the article, it should be formalized using the WP:Requested moves process. Favonian (talk) 21:24, 1 January 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just added archive links to 2 external links on

• Added archive https://web.archive.org/20060214234827/http://www.parlimen.gov.my:80/eng-dN-diPertua.htm to http://www.parlimen.gov.my/eng-dN-diPertua.htm
• Added archive https://web.archive.org/20060214234522/http://www.parlimen.gov.my:80/eng-dN-Timb.htm to http://www.parlimen.gov.my/eng-dN-Timb.htm

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true to let others know.

This message was posted before February 2018.

• If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
• If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—