Talk:Die Humpty-Dumpty-Maschine der totalen Zukunft

This article is rated Start-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects:

Germany Low‑importance This article is within the scope of WikiProject Germany, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Germany on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.GermanyWikipedia:WikiProject GermanyTemplate:WikiProject GermanyGermany articles Low This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale. Sculpture This article is within the scope of WikiProject Sculpture, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Sculpture on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.SculptureWikipedia:WikiProject SculptureTemplate:WikiProject Sculpturesculpture articles Visual arts: Public art This article is within the scope of WikiProject Visual arts, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of visual arts on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Visual artsWikipedia:WikiProject Visual artsTemplate:WikiProject Visual artsvisual arts articles This article is supported by the public art task force.

It is requested that a map or maps be included in this article to improve its quality. Wikipedians in Germany may be able to help!

The following Wikimedia Commons file used on this page or its Wikidata item has been nominated for deletion:

• Skulptur Bodestr 1-3 (Mitte) DIe Humpty-Dumpty Maschine Jonathan Meese.jpg

Participate in the deletion discussion at the nomination page. —Community Tech bot (talk) 02:37, 7 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

The discussion is going on about the German copyright law. There is a famous case about the Wrapped Reichstag, where Cristo and Jeanne-Claude sued a professionial issuer of postcards, and this case went up to the Federal Court of Justice. The wrapping art project was considered to be a temporary installation, so only private fotos can be taken but not fotos which are commercially explointed - that is the right of the creator. As the Wikimedia licence for Commons material implies that any use of uploaded meadia is allowed, there might be a clash of interests if indeed in this case (4 years of display in the museum's front garden vs. 2 weeks of a wrapped building) the originator's rights need to be protected. --Gunnar (talk) 17:59, 14 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Just in case you want to read the DE references, I do recommend the DeepL-App as this is even better than Google Translate: it gives more precise results without the need to finetune after the translator has done its job. Sounds naturally. --Gunnar (talk) 17:59, 14 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

I will try your recommendation. Really, lets see how this goes. --77.123.103.125 (talk) 13:25, 15 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

The following Wikimedia Commons file used on this page or its Wikidata item has been nominated for deletion:

• Diktatur der kunst 2023.jpg

Participate in the deletion discussion at the nomination page. —Community Tech bot (talk) 13:31, 2 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]