Talk:Don Davis (North Carolina politician)

This article must adhere to the biographies of living persons (BLP) policy, even if it is not a biography, because it contains material about living persons. Contentious material about living persons that is unsourced or poorly sourced must be removed immediately from the article and its talk page, especially if potentially libellous. If such material is repeatedly inserted, or if you have other concerns, please report the issue to this noticeboard.

If you are a subject of this article, or acting on behalf of one, and you need help, please see this help page.

Biography: Politics and Government

	Biography portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Biography, a collaborative effort to create, develop and organize Wikipedia's articles about people. All interested editors are invited to join the project and contribute to the discussion. For instructions on how to use this banner, please refer to the documentation.BiographyWikipedia:WikiProject BiographyTemplate:WikiProject Biographybiography articles
	This article is supported by the politics and government work group (assessed as Low-importance).

United States: North Carolina Low‑importance

	United States portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject United States, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of topics relating to the United States of America on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the ongoing discussions. Template Usage Articles Requested! Become a Member Project Talk Alerts United StatesWikipedia:WikiProject United StatesTemplate:WikiProject United StatesUnited States articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.
	North Carolina portal This article is supported by WikiProject North Carolina (assessed as Low-importance).

U.S. Congress Low‑importance

	United States portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject U.S. Congress, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of the United States Congress on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.U.S. CongressWikipedia:WikiProject U.S. CongressTemplate:WikiProject U.S. CongressU.S. Congress articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.
	This article has not yet been assigned a subject. The options are: "Person", "People", "Place", "Thing", or "Events".

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 3 external links on

Donald G. Davis. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ

for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at {{

Sourcecheck

}}).

This message was posted before February 2018.

regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check

}} (last update: 18 January 2022).

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 11:33, 15 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Removing opinionated/biased content

This page had a large section of content written in a biased manner, in addition to lacking grammatical clarity and proper sourcing. Before adding this section or its contents back, please see Wikipedia:Neutral point of view. -- Wiki9814 (talk) 06:51, 5 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

@Wiki9814 I directly copy the source itself. Geeky1127 (talk) 23:47, 8 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Fact is fact and Huffpost is a credible source.

Deleting fact by wrongly claim it is not well sourced should not be allowed. Geeky1127 (talk) 23:46, 8 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Geeky, the source is fine but your edit itself was extremely poor quality, has a lot of grammatical errors, and is way too long for something cited to a single article (see

WP:UNDUE). I also see that Wiki9814 clearly explained this in the revert. ThadeusOfNazereth(he/they)^{Talk to Me!} 22:40, 10 May 2022 (UTC)[reply

]

Then corect the grammar error instead of deleting vital information. Geeky1127 (talk) 00:35, 11 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

No. We are not going to clean up your mess. Your information is not "vital". Drmies (talk) 13:46, 11 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]