Talk:Droga5

Page contents not supported in other languages.
Source: Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia.
WikiProject iconCompanies Low‑importance
WikiProject iconThis article is within the scope of WikiProject Companies, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of companies on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.
LowThis article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.
WikiProject Companies To-do:

Here are some tasks awaiting attention:
WikiProject iconMarketing & Advertising Low‑importance
WikiProject iconThis article is within the scope of WikiProject Marketing & Advertising, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Marketing on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.
LowThis article has been rated as Low-importance on the importance scale.
WikiProject iconNew York City Low‑importance
WikiProject iconThis article is within the scope of WikiProject New York City, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of New York City-related articles on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.
LowThis article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Campaigns data move from page on 7 Feb 2012 - move back as considered needed

Notable Campaigns

Lots of text in the history if needed. Ariconte (talk) 01:04, 8 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]

COI note

It would be good if uninvolved editors went through the references and tried to develop some new ones. I have tagged and an admitted employee (User talk:Carly.n.bennett and here) does not agree. Regards, Ariconte (talk) 00:20, 8 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]

I noticed the request for attention on Wikiproject Business and gave the article a rough trim. Here's my rationale on the article overall:
  • There is too little information about the company's history, which is what is most important to us
  • There are far too many primary sources, instead of secondary sources
  • There was a lot of information about individual executives and staffing, which isn't something we normally include
  • A company's notable works is something we include, but we are careful to be selective about those that are included
  • Awards is something we do include, but we are careful only to include those that are significant.
Corporate 14:32, 21 October 2012 (UTC)[reply
]

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just added archive links to 2 external links on

nobots
|deny=InternetArchiveBot}} to keep me off the page altogether. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true to let others know.

This message was posted before February 2018.

regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check
}} (last update: 18 January 2022).

Cheers.—

Talk to my owner:Online 08:27, 29 January 2016 (UTC)[reply
]

COI

As noted in the article linked to above, it's rather obvious that @

single purpose account with a conflict of interest here. We desperately need some neutral editors to have a look at this. PanydThe muffin is not subtle 10:48, 17 May 2016 (UTC)[reply
]