Talk:Duck Dodgers (TV series)

This article is rated C-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects:

Television Low‑importance This article is within the scope of WikiProject Television, a collaborative effort to develop and improve Wikipedia articles about television programs. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page where you can join the discussion. To improve this article, please refer to the style guidelines for the type of work.TelevisionWikipedia:WikiProject TelevisionTemplate:WikiProject Televisiontelevision articles Low This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale. Cartoon Network Low‑importance This article is within the scope of WikiProject Cartoon Network, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of articles relating to Cartoon Network on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Cartoon NetworkWikipedia:WikiProject Cartoon NetworkTemplate:WikiProject Cartoon NetworkCartoon Network articles Low This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale. Animation: American / Television / Warner Bros. / Looney Tunes Low‑importance This article is within the scope of WikiProject Animation, a collaborative effort to build an encyclopedic guide to animation on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, you can edit the article attached to this page, help out with the open tasks, or contribute to the discussion.AnimationWikipedia:WikiProject AnimationTemplate:WikiProject AnimationAnimation articles Low This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale. This article is supported by the American animation work group (assessed as Low-importance). This article is supported by the Animated television work group (assessed as Low-importance). This article is supported by the Warner Bros. Animation work group (assessed as Low-importance). This article is supported by the Looney Tunes work group (assessed as Low-importance). An editor has requested that an image or photograph be added to this article. Science Fiction Low‑importance This article is within the scope of WikiProject Science Fiction, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of science fiction on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Science FictionWikipedia:WikiProject Science FictionTemplate:WikiProject Science Fictionscience fiction articles Low This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale. Comedy Low‑importance This article is within the scope of WikiProject Comedy, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of comedy on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.ComedyWikipedia:WikiProject ComedyTemplate:WikiProject ComedyComedy articles Low This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale. United States: Animation / Television Low‑importance This article is within the scope of WikiProject United States, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of topics relating to the United States of America on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the ongoing discussions. Template Usage Articles Requested! Become a Member Project Talk Alerts United StatesWikipedia:WikiProject United StatesTemplate:WikiProject United StatesUnited States articles Low This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale. This article is supported by WikiProject Animation - American animation work group (assessed as Low-importance). This article is supported by American television task force (assessed as Low-importance).

okay now this article is way to small

Why was it cancelled? Low ratings? --Plainnym 21:48, 26 June 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Probably.Or maybe it took too long to make the CG sequences.Cfive 14:00, 25 August 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Allright! Great job, whoever pasted the picture that actually represents the characters from DUCK DODGERS in normal dress! I had expressed concern over the original picture that was on here for quite a while (it featured them all in cowboy dress, an allusion to Drip-Along Daffy). For more info about what I mean, see the Daffy Duck talk page. [User:164.58.96.126|164.58.96.126]] 18:54, 16 December 2006 (UTC)JS

And I enjoyed the theme song. Can somebody post the lyrics somewhere in the article or this talk page. I'd greatly appreciate it!

These are the lyrics from what i can remember:

Frozen, in a time of space divide/ But how will the universe survive?/ Duck Dodgers of the 24th and 1/2th Century/ He's protecting the powerless and the weak/ Duck Dodgers is fighting tyranny/ In the 24th and 1/2 century!!!!!!!

There you have it.

164.58.96.126 19:30, 29 December 2006 (UTC)JS[reply]

• I just recently re-watched Duck Dodgers on Boomerang, and came away with my positive thoughts of it reinforced. I admit the show IS NOT close to the quality of the classic WB shorts, that it DOES make an idiot out of Daffy (who never truly was an idiot), but at least it's better than Loonatics Unleashed! I find myself actually laughing at the stupid jokes and sometimes amusing allusions and riffs. ... And then of course there's that THEME SONG!

By the way, I found out there was an error in my transcript of the theme song. This is actually how it goes:

Frozen, in a time and space divide...

But how would the universe survive?

Duck Dodgers of the 24th and 1/2 century!

He's protecting the powerless and the weak!

Duck Dodgers is [or he's] fighting tyranny!

In the 24th and 1/2 century_________________

----Posted by JS, otherwise known as 164.58.96.126, on February 14, 2007, on 11:10 am.

I like of this serie a lot. It currant on tv (called SBT television brazilian system), and i'm brazilian. —The preceding

Don't forget The Iron Giant... — Cinemaniac (talk) 00:08, 18 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]