Talk:ENTP

This article was nominated for deletion on 13 April 2008. The result of the discussion was keep.

This redirect does not require a rating on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects:

Psychology Low‑importance This redirect is within the scope of WikiProject Psychology, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Psychology on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.PsychologyWikipedia:WikiProject PsychologyTemplate:WikiProject Psychologypsychology articles Low This redirect has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Why am I not surprised that this page remains thin while, say,

see my comment below. the INTJ description was a copyvio anyway. Niffweed17, Destroyer of Chickens 01:06, 12 July 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Here as in life the other 95% of the world do not appreciate the ENTP, we seem to be to much for others to understand, but that's OK, we know and are confident in our ENTP orientation... —Preceding unsigned comment added by 71.110.85.124 (talk) 20:10, 9 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]

The nomination for deletion had nothing to do with ENTPs specifically. All the MBTI personality type articles were nominated for deletion; however, they've been considerably improved since then. ThreeOfCups (talk) 03:37, 10 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]

I just deleted the descriptions on all of these personality types. A lot of them were copyvios from different sources, several of them being from http://www.geocities.com/lifexplore/ , where they may or may not have been copied from other locations. Nonetheless, the three theories of MBTI, Keirsey Temperaments, and Socionics are quite different and require different descriptions of types, functions, relations, and other concepts. Socionics especially differs from the other two. The three theories should all be expanded upon in Wikipedia, but it is impossible to do this while there is a conglomeration of these three theories and they are treated as one and the same. Niffweed17, Destroyer of Chickens 01:06, 12 July 2006 (UTC)[reply]

We ENTPs were going to finish editing the page, but got distracted.

I'm not sure it's quite accurate to say, "More so than other types, ENTPs can 'think outside the box' and come up with fresh, unexpected solutions to difficult problems." All four types with dominant intuition excel at creative problem solving. The difference is in what they apply their creative problem solving to. For instance, INFJs are likely to be better than ENTPs at helping individuals solve personal problems. So I removed the phrase "More so than other types" for now, until someone can better define in what arena of problem-solving ENTPs are better than the other types. (BTW, I didn't edit this article as drastically as the diff would seem to indicate. I mainly moved things around and removed a few "very"s and "incredibly"s. Intensifiers like that tend to weaken text anyway.) —Preceding unsigned comment added by ThreeOfCups (talk • contribs) 15:43, 10 May 2008 (UTC)[reply]

I was looking at the links, and typetango is a dating site. I'm not familiar with the rules, so if this is actually innapropriate, someone might want to delete that.

These pages are pretty low-quality. Would be nice if all the types followed the same structure and had the same amount of detail. INTJ/INTP are huge, whereas this one and many others have hardly anything at all (as previously stated). —Preceding unsigned comment added by 97.84.136.2 (talk) 02:18, 30 October 2007 (UTC)[reply]

I'm working on making these pages more consistent. As you might expect, however, each article seems to be edited most by people who fall under that type or a similar one. This means that the focus of the INTP page, for example, is completely different than the ESFP page. There's value in each of these approaches, so perfect consistency may not be a reasonable goal. If the character of the article reflects the character of the type to a certain degree, I'm not sure that's a bad thing. ThreeOfCups (talk) 15:05, 4 May 2008 (UTC)[reply]

someone explain why my additions have been deleted. —Preceding unsigned comment added by Red aries (talk • contribs) 13:26, 1 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Hi, Red aries. I reverted the changes because you did not supply a

reliable source for the ENTPs you added to the list. If you look in the history, there were some edits that removed names as "suspect" because they were not listed at Keirsey. I took the time to compile the current list with references (sometimes multiple references) for each name. If you know where you read that Mao Zedong and Julius Ceasar were ENTPs I'd be happy to help you format the reference. If you have any questions feel free to contact me on my talk page. MoodyGroove (talk) 13:49, 1 February 2008 (UTC)MoodyGroove[reply

]

I like how the paragraph following the heading "ENTP Profile" begins at least four sentences with the word "however." —Preceding unsigned comment added by 71.240.73.38 (talk) 01:03, 16 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]

I strongly recommend that this section be deleted. The information may be fun, but it has no place in an encyclopedia. There's no factual basis for the claim that Alexander the Great, for example, was an ENTP. Such unscientific speculation is fodder for skeptics. It screams 'pop psyschology' and casts doubt on the integrity of the entire system. A link to the Keirsey site would make the information available to interested readers without undermining the validity of this article. ThreeOfCups (talk) 02:20, 28 April 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Another option would be to follow the lead of the ESTP article. That article lists famous ESTPs as a single sentence, including the most illustrustrative examples: "According to Keirsey, based on observations of behavior, famous Promoters include

• I agree entirely with ThreeOfCups. Compiling a list of "Notable ENTPs" is mere guesswork, and assignments made by different observers can vary widely, making suspect their educational value. This is especially true of historical examples such as Alexander the Great. --Halcatalyst (talk) 01:38, 28 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]

In addition to the above suggestion, I'm thinking of moving the long list of "Notable ENTPs" to the Inventor article, then referencing it here. That way the information will still be available to those who are interested. The list is far more appropriate in the article for the Keirsey type than in the one for the MB type. ThreeOfCups (talk) 03:29, 29 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Only some of the names are referenced by Keirsey. If there is going to be a list (and I don't have a problem with it as long as it's sourced) then it should be here. MoodyGroove (talk) 17:30, 29 July 2008 (UTC)MoodyGroove[reply]

The problem with having it here is that this kind of speculation violates the M-B ethical principles. However, it's in keeping with Keirsey's temperament theory, which is based on behavior rather than cognitive functions. Since articles exist for both expressions of the type, I think we should take advantage of the differences between the two theories and place this information where it fits most organically. ThreeOfCups (talk) 01:13, 30 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Someone else deleted this section from this article, so I added it to the

Inventor (Role Variant) article. ThreeOfCups (talk) 22:22, 30 July 2008 (UTC)[reply

]

• Steve Jobs Chairman and CEO, Apple Inc -failed several times and recovered from the failures
• George Clooney American actor, film director, producer, and screenwriter - popular person who can deal with complex issues
• Michael Douglas American actor and producer, primarily in movies and television,
• Lloyd Blankfein Chief Executive Officer and Chairman of Goldman Sachs
• Matt Taibbi American journalist - skillful writer who is able to communicate complex issues with the public
• Vladimir Putin Prime Minister of Russia - former secret agent officer!! can deal with complex issues - no sign of megalomany (That is good)
• Dmitry Anatolyevich Medvedev
  3rd President of Russia - skillful politican, popular, quiet, and lovable person, (may be ESTJ)
• Michael Schumacher seven-time Formula One World Drivers' Champion - ingenious driver - has very good moral values
• Napoleon Bonaparte
  military and political leader of France - has failed the russian campaign, displayed signs of megalomany - his solders have loved him and died for him.
• Mahmoud Ahmadinejad President of Iran - Popular politican of Iran (he has not failed morally yet. :) Who knows what comes in the future?? Unfortunatelly he is not as strong as he thinks of himself.
• J. Robert Oppenheimer American theoretical physicist, thinker and inventor type, director of the Manhattan Project, "The Father of the Atomic Bomb" —Preceding unsigned comment added by 83.79.162.108 (talk) 16:02, 7 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]
• Erich Hartmann highest-scoring fighter ace in the history of aerial warfare, ingenious fighter pilot
• Yuri Alekseyevich Gagarin
  first human in outer space and the first to orbit the Earth, extrovert, thinker, intuitive, perceptive.
• Clark Gable American film actor, observer-gunner in B-17 Flying Fortresses bomber during World War II
• Asok (Dilbert character)
  an Indian intern in the Dilbert comic strip, a brilliant graduate from the Indian Institute of Technology, Asok often solves difficult problems in a few keystrokes, but he is still naïve to the cruelties and politics of the business world. As a result, he often ends up being the scapegoat for his coworkers' antics.
• Leonardo DiCaprio American actor and film producer
• Howard Hughes American aviator, engineer, industrialist, film producer, film director, philanthropist, and one of the wealthiest people in the world —Preceding unsigned comment added by 83.77.223.59 (talk) 09:44, 8 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]
• Nicolas Sarkozy the 23rd and current President of the French Republic —Preceding unsigned comment added by 83.77.223.59 (talk) 11:18, 8 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]
• Captain B. McCrea, the sole commander of the Axiom in film WALL-E. Throughout his duties as captain, he is bogged down by daily routines and boredom. Meeting WALL-E, however, has sparked his interest in Earth, and he becomes enthusiastically engrossed in researching the home he never knew before, ultimately paving the way for a more dynamic leadership role.
• Eric Cartman a fictional character on the American animated television series South Park —Preceding unsigned comment added by 83.77.192.213 (talk) 19:04, 11 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]
• Dale Carnegie an American writer and lecturer and the developer of famous courses in self-improvement, salesmanship, corporate training, public speaking and interpersonal skills.

People on this list have been failed during their carrier and many times they were able to recover from the failure. Some of them displays the negativ characteristics of ENTPs such as over-confidence, megalomany. Sometimes loosing moral values. All of these people has some kind of talent or unuque skill that helped them to rise up from the society. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 83.79.162.108 (talk) 14:53, 7 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]

• Sherlock Holmes (2009 film) is a 2009 action mystery film based on the character of the same name created by Sir Arthur Conan Doyle, Sherlock Holmes often pictured as ENTJ type. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 83.76.163.34 (talk) 13:08, 10 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]

These people with high moral values are very important players in the society. When the moral moral values are lost or under stress situation they can collapse.

I would like to point out that Steven Spielberg is not an ENTP but rather an ISFP. Slightly introvert, sensing, not a rational, cooperative with others etc. Could someone correct this? —Preceding unsigned comment added by 83.79.162.108 (talk) 16:51, 7 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Tom Hanks is an ESTJ not an ENTP. Excellent actor but no invetions, technical skills or entrepreniour ideas. Straight body posture. high self esteem, but not strategic thinker like INTJs. This should be corrected.

I created templates for text that's the same across all 16 type articles to eliminate the hours of work it takes to update the same text 16 times. This is a recommended use for templates according to Wikipedia policy WM:TEMP.

To edit the templates:
1. Click the Edit link on the section of the article you want to change.
2. Select and copy the title of the template page (the text between the double braces).
3. Paste the copied text into the Wikipedia search box and press Go (not Search).
This will take you to the template. Make sure that the changes you make to the templates are appropriate for all 16 type articles! (INFJ, ESTP, etc.) ThreeOfCups (talk) 03:52, 20 May 2008 (UTC)[reply]

The MBTI, Keirsey Temperament Sorter, and related Jung Typology assessments use the original spelling, Extraversion, rather than the modern corruption, Extroversion. In this context, Extraversion is jargon and should be thus spelled. ThreeOfCups (talk) 15:06, 7 June 2008 (UTC)[reply]

For a discussion about the logo and border color, see

I would like to edit the list of famous ENTPs. I believe Mao zedong is one of the famous entps and would like to add him. —Preceding unsigned comment added by Red aries (talk • contribs) 09:01, 9 October 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Unfortunately, it isn't enough that you believe it. You also need to provide a reliable, verifiable source for any information that you contribute to Wikipedia. See

WP:CITE. ThreeOfCups (talk) 01:18, 10 October 2009 (UTC)[reply

]

How do you cite sources, and what do u mean by reliable verifiable source? —Preceding unsigned comment added by Red aries (talk • contribs) 14:49, 1 November 2009 (UTC)[reply]

I removed the following sentence for being vague and perplexing in context, where it appeared at the end of

The other recreational pseudo-psychology systems Socionics and Enneagram of Personality have only a single article. In the meantime it would be beneficial to remove the references of "notable persons of this personality type" seeing as the Myers–Briggs_Type_Indicator is make-believe. 104.228.101.152 (talk) 02:12, 14 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

 You are invited to join the discussion at Talk:Myers–Briggs Type Indicator#Redirects and a new hatnote. Shhhnotsoloud (talk) 10:18, 13 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]