Talk:Ecology of Banksia

This article is rated C-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects:

Banksia: Plants High‑importance This article is part of WikiProject Banksia, which aims to improve Wikipedia's coverage of the plant genus Banksia and related topics. If you would like to participate, visit the project page.BanksiaWikipedia:WikiProject BanksiaTemplate:WikiProject BanksiaBanksia articles High This article has been rated as High-importance on the project's importance scale. This article is supported by WikiProject Plants (assessed as Low-importance). Australia: Biota Low‑importance Ecology of Banksia is within the scope of WikiProject Australia, which aims to improve Wikipedia's coverage of Australia and Australia-related topics. If you would like to participate, visit the project page.AustraliaWikipedia:WikiProject AustraliaTemplate:WikiProject AustraliaAustralia articles Low This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale. This article is supported by WikiProject Australian biota (assessed as Low-importance). Need help improving this article? Ask a LibrarianWhat's this? at the National Library of Australia. The Wikimedia Australia chapter can be contacted via email to helpwikimedia.org.au for non-editorial assistance. Ecology Low‑importance This article is within the scope of the WikiProject Ecology, an effort to create, expand, organize, and improve ecology-related articles.EcologyWikipedia:WikiProject EcologyTemplate:WikiProject EcologyEcology articles Low This article has been rated as Low-importance on the importance scale.

On B.telmatiaea the article talks about it being an indicator species to the presence of dieback, is this sufficiently common to include it this article. Gnangarra 01:27, 16 May 2007 (UTC)[reply]

I wouldn't have thought so initially but am not too familiar with the west's indicator species apart from most proteaceae in general - and B. grandis and B. speciosa being referred to as such...cheers, Cas Liber | talk | contribs 01:30, 16 May 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Another observation there's two sections on fire "Response to Fire" and conservation subsection "Fire regime". Gnangarra 01:31, 16 May 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Yeah - tricky that. I was musing on whether (to make a hierarchy of headings), there should be a section on reproduction with subheadings pollination/fire/seedlings etc. but then there is still the same problem as one can talk about fire under both reproduction and conservation....cheers, Cas Liber | talk | contribs 01:37, 16 May 2007 (UTC)[reply]