Talk:Edward J. Flanagan

The following is a closed discussion of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on the talk page. Editors desiring to contest the closing decision should consider a move review after discussing it on the closer's talk page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.

The result of the move request was: no consensus. (closed by non-admin page mover) —Nnadigoodluck🇳🇬 09:39, 1 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]

• Edward J. Flanagan → Father Flanagan
• Francis P. Duffy → Father Duffy

– Per

• Oppose. I should imagine there have been numerous notable priests called Father Flanagan and Father Duffy, so there's certainly nothing unambiguous about these names. Most priests are in fact most commonly referred to as Father Foo or Reverend Foo or Bishop Foo or Cardinal Foo (e.g. how often is John Henry Newman referred to as anything other than Cardinal Newman?). Should we move all of them? -- Necrothesp (talk) 13:53, 19 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]
  • There may indeed be a case for renaming
    Cardinal Newman. Two wrongs do not make a right. I can see no previous discussion at Talk:John Henry Newman, nor any previous moves at history:John Henry Newman, so it may not be a precedent. Andrewa (talk
    )
    • I have only used Newman as an obvious example. There are many thousands of others. Also see
      WP:NCCL in general, where it says that "Cardinal" (or other religious titles) are not generally used in article titles, even though most religious dignitaries are referred to using them. I see no reason to break the conventions for these two gentlemen. -- Necrothesp (talk) 10:40, 24 February 2020 (UTC)[reply
      ]
• Support both but would not oppose relisting in view of the single oppose
  !vote above and lack of other participation. I note that the proposed article titles both redirect to the articles, and always have... more than ten years in both cases. There is no ambiguity, and no reason not to go with the common names. Our imaginations do not overrule our policies. Andrewa (talk) 18:01, 21 February 2020 (UTC)[reply
  ]
• Support per nom.--Ortizesp (talk) 20:32, 21 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]
• Oppose. Agree that "Father Flanagan/Duffy" is the "common name" here by usual standards, but would lean against using that title due to
  MOS:HONORIFIC if we have a better alternative. The full name is accurate and neutral, a primary redirect from Father (Name) is harmless. I'd only want to override COMMONNAME if the usage was truly common and widespread, e.g. the classic Mother Theresa example. SnowFire (talk) 06:05, 23 February 2020 (UTC)[reply
  ]
• Oppose, since I think SnowFire is right. --Quiz shows 18:46, 23 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of a

talk page or in a move review

. No further edits should be made to this section.