Talk:Elon Hogsett
This article is rated B-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
External links modified
Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified one external link on
- Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20070930235814/http://www.baseballlibrary.com/ballplayers/player.php?name=Chief_Hogsett_1903 to http://www.baseballlibrary.com/ballplayers/player.php?name=Chief_Hogsett_1903
When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at {{
).
This message was posted before February 2018.
{{source check
- If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
- If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.
Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 23:23, 21 November 2016 (UTC)
Rename proposal Chief Hogsett --> Elon Hogsett
Consistent with recent discussion at
- "elon hogsett" pitcher for 1925–1944 gets 16,212 hits
- "chief hogsett" pitcher for 1925–1944 gets 5,312 hits
- "elon hogsett" baseball for 1925–1944 gets 15,003 hits
- "chief hogsett" baseball for 1925–1944 gets 5,048 hits
- "elon hogsett" tigers pitcher for 1929–1936 gets 9,122 hits
- "chief hogsett" tigers pitcher for 1929–1936 gets 1,933 hits
As there is no current article named "Elon Hogsett" on Wikipedia, this would be a straightforward move, with "Chief Hogsett" continuing to redirect users to the new article title. Comments welcome—please reply in the below section. Thanks. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Dmoore5556 (talk • contribs) 13:06, May 8, 2021 (UTC)
- It appears that Cbl62 expanded this in October 2020. I'm curious to hear their thoughts on the article title. – Muboshgu (talk) 20:15, 8 May 2021 (UTC)
Requested move 8 May 2021
- The following is a closed discussion of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on the talk page. Editors desiring to contest the closing decision should consider a move review after discussing it on the closer's talk page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.
The result of the move request was: Moved (non-admin closure) (t · c) buidhe 00:48, 16 May 2021 (UTC)
- Support - perhaps a closer call than some of the others, but I think the preponderance of the evidence supports the move, unless Cbl62 thinks differently. Go Phightins! 20:10, 14 May 2021 (UTC)