Talk:English College, Rome
This article is rated Start-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
Category:English College, Rome
The related . You are encouraged to join the discussion on the Categories for discussion page. |
--BrownHairedGirl (talk) • (contribs) 13:03, 15 March 2010 (UTC)
Suggested name change
- The following discussion is an archived discussion of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on the talk page. No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the move request was: page moved. Ronhjones (Talk) 21:29, 25 March 2010 (UTC)
- Question. Do you have any evidence of that assertion of common usage? At WP:COMMONNAME says follow common usage, and the scanty evidence I have seen so far points to common usage including the prefix "venerable". I'd be delighted if you could prove me wrong. --BrownHairedGirl (talk) • (contribs) 13:57, 17 March 2010 (UTC)]
- Indeed, that is the question. Apart from the historical issue - the college only became "Venerable" in 1818 - there seems a divergence between Catholic sources and general newspapers etc, but there are more of the former. I find the plain version more normal myself, but the ghits suggest otherwise. Johnbod (talk) 14:16, 17 March 2010 (UTC)
- I think the ghits numbers largely reflects the use of Venerable in the wikipedia article which is reproduced or referenced on other sites, which leads to numerous ghits. Within Wikipedia, there is wide use of simply "English College, Rome" or "English College in Rome". Using searches in Wikipedia for these exact phrases, theses are in 52 and 30 articles, although there is some overlap, whereas "Venerable English College" appears only in 45 articles. This would seem to indicate that, at least within Wikipedia, the simple "English College, Rome" is the more common name despite the title of the article. Cjc13 (talk) 14:49, 17 March 2010 (UTC)
- Redoing the searches with "-wikipedia" barely changes the figures: 310,000 for "Venerable English college" rome -wikipedia, against 50,000 for "English college" rome -wikipedia.
- The usage on Wikipedia isn't really relevant, because Wikipedia is not a reliable source. --BrownHairedGirl (talk) • (contribs) 15:11, 17 March 2010 (UTC)
- I think the ghits numbers largely reflects the use of Venerable in the wikipedia article which is reproduced or referenced on other sites, which leads to numerous ghits. Within Wikipedia, there is wide use of simply "English College, Rome" or "English College in Rome". Using searches in Wikipedia for these exact phrases, theses are in 52 and 30 articles, although there is some overlap, whereas "Venerable English College" appears only in 45 articles. This would seem to indicate that, at least within Wikipedia, the simple "English College, Rome" is the more common name despite the title of the article. Cjc13 (talk) 14:49, 17 March 2010 (UTC)
- More data. Searching google news UK archives, I find 172 hits for "Venerable English college" rome and 585 hits for "English college" rome.
Redoing the search with Google scholar, I get 159 ghits for "Venerable English college" rome and 2,670 ghits for "English college" rome.
Is it it safe to assume that hits in google new and google scholar are more likely to be reliable sources than a general google search? If so, I think the evidence points to dropping the "venerable". --BrownHairedGirl (talk) • (contribs) 15:26, 17 March 2010 (UTC) - Support move. I think that google news & google scholar results above justify "English College, Rome" as the more common name. --BrownHairedGirl (talk) • (contribs) 11:16, 24 March 2010 (UTC)
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on this talk page. No further edits should be made to this section.
External links modified
Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified one external link on English College, Rome. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
- Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20041001083540/http://www.vatican.va:80/ to http://www.vatican.va
When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at {{
).
This message was posted before February 2018.
{{source check
- If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
- If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.
Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 13:30, 24 December 2016 (UTC)
External links modified
Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified 2 external links on English College, Rome. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
- Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20121204195925/http://www.zenit.org/article-36083?l=english to http://www.zenit.org/article-36083?l=english
- Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20061008071807/http://www.ad2000.com.au/articles/2002/may2002p17_1009.html to http://www.ad2000.com.au/articles/2002/may2002p17_1009.html
When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.
This message was posted before February 2018.
{{source check
- If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
- If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.
Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 15:58, 23 December 2017 (UTC)
Move discussion in progress
There is a move discussion in progress on Talk:Roman Colleges which affects this page. Please participate on that page and not in this talk page section. Thank you. —RMCD bot 14:46, 18 July 2019 (UTC)