Talk:Environmental soil science

This article is rated Stub-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects:

Environment Low‑importance Low This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale. Science Low‑importance This article is within the scope of WikiProject Science, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Science on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.ScienceWikipedia:WikiProject ScienceTemplate:WikiProject Sciencescience articles Low This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale. Soil Low‑importance Environmental soil science is within the scope of WikiProject Soil, which collaborates on Soil and related articles on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, you can choose to edit this article, or visit the project page for more information.SoilWikipedia:WikiProject SoilTemplate:WikiProject SoilSoil articles Low This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Category:Environmental soil science is a subcategory of Category:Environmental science. the article environmental soil science is already mentioned in the environmental soil science category description, it would be redundant to place environmental soil science in the environmental soil science category also. Paleorthid 03:03, 4 April 2006 (UTC)[reply]

I dispute my statement above based on a better understanding of policy. Note for example: In theory, if a main article is categorized correctly in its corresponding category, the use of the catmore template is redundant. from

Wikipedia:Categorization FAQ. -- Paleorthid 17:18, 10 June 2006 (UTC)[reply

]

Would the list of fundamental and applied aspects be better suited as a bullet point list? Pthesken (talk) 23:19, 25 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]