This article is within the scope of WikiProject Classical Greece and Rome, a group of contributors interested in Wikipedia's articles on classics. If you would like to join the WikiProject or learn how to contribute, please see our project page. If you need assistance from a classicist, please see our talk page.Classical Greece and RomeWikipedia:WikiProject Classical Greece and RomeTemplate:WikiProject Classical Greece and RomeClassical Greece and Rome articles
good and 1.0 standards, or visit the wikiproject page for more details.ReligionWikipedia:WikiProject ReligionTemplate:WikiProject ReligionReligion articles
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Greece, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Greece on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.GreeceWikipedia:WikiProject GreeceTemplate:WikiProject GreeceGreek articles
The following discussion is an archived discussion of the proposal. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on the talk page. No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the proposal was moved. Nothing done to
Erotes (Lucian) will be created as a redirect. --BDD (talk) 22:38, 5 June 2013 (UTC)[reply
Erotes (Lucian) (the macron isn't needed: who's going to search for it with that?), it not only seems less likely as the search target, but also has a straightforward and sufficient disambiguator. Because only two pages are involved, no dab is needed: disambiguation can be accomplished with a "For" hatnote. Cynwolfe (talk) 20:29, 28 May 2013 (UTC)[reply
]
Support this article seems to be the primary topic. Paul August☎ 22:22, 28 May 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Support. As long as the artistic motif is closely connected and reasonably covered in the article, there's no need to disambiguate here; the Lucian disambiguator should suffice. And macrons aren't normally used in western writing, except to indicate pronunciation. They should probably never occur in article titles from these languages (I believe they are widely used in some modes of representing Japanese in the Latin alphabet, however). P Aculeius (talk) 23:14, 28 May 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Yes, I think that's true of Japanese. Cynwolfe (talk) 19:35, 29 May 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Support. I'm agnostic on the Ps.-Lucian title. Standard reference works will still generally follow the practice used in earlier treatments of Greek corpora, but I do remember at least one recent article that called it the Erotes. davidiad{ t } 12:28, 29 May 2013 (UTC)[reply]
If Amores is more common for the title of the work than Erotes, that's more reason not to disambiguate. Cynwolfe (talk) 19:35, 29 May 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Well, for what it's worth, the OCD and New Pauly both still use the old corpus titles for Lucianic works. (I feel like I'm frowning at youths dancing to say I'm happy to see this and not "Loves". I'd drown my Lucian if this were the case.) davidiad{ t } 22:46, 29 May 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Support, rational proposal with good rationale. — Cirt (talk) 18:50, 29 May 2013 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the proposal. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on this talk page. No further edits should be made to this section.
Media related to Erotes, Eros and Pothos at Wikimedia Commons
