Talk:Eugène Atget
This level-5 vital article is rated B-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
A fact from this article was featured on Wikipedia's Main Page in the On this day section on February 12, 2021. |
Link to Major Collection Reverted?
I created a link to Atget's work that is on display online at JGS (a not-for-profit collection). Not only do I think this is relevant, but as a scholar hoping to view some of the work, I would be grateful for the link. Why the revert?? --Eastsidetruman (talk) 14:17, 1 April 2010 (UTC)
WikiProject class rating
This article was automatically assessed because at least one article was rated and this bot brought all the other ratings up to at least that level. BetacommandBot 03:12, 27 August 2007 (UTC)
art historians' affection for Atget's photographs
Inebriated historians of photography occasionally conflate their affection for Atget's Au Tambour of 1908 (http://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/Image:Au_tambour.jpg) - arguably one of the better photographs ever made - with baseball fans' affection for long-ball hitter Ted Williams's final home run in his last game at Fenway Park in 1960. In both cases, the sensation is expressed colloquially as "Did you see that? Holy Cow, that's unbelievable!" —Preceding unsigned comment added by 70.23.94.233 (talk) 20:45, 19 December 2007 (UTC)
Flaneur
Reference to Atget as a Flaneur is footnoted, but the note does not tell us that HE was a flaneur. Is there a specific page reference? What is the value of calling him one in this context? — Preceding unsigned comment added by 98.217.59.211 (talk) 13:07, 9 July 2014 (UTC)
Needs (badly) info on camera(s) used, lenses, negative and print development methods, etc.
Needs (badly) info on camera(s) used, lenses, negative and print development methods, etc.
External links modified
Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified one external link on Eugène Atget. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
- Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20061108115344/http://www.lensculture.com/rauschenberg.html to http://www.lensculture.com/rauschenberg.html
When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.
This message was posted before February 2018.
{{source check
- If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
- If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.
Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 12:55, 30 November 2017 (UTC)