The subject of this article is controversial and content may be in dispute. When updating the article, be bold, but not reckless. Feel free to try to improve the article, but don't take it personally if your changes are reversed; instead, come here to the talk page to discuss them. Content must be written from a neutral point of view. Include citations when adding content and consider tagging or removing unsourced information.
This article was nominated for deletion on 27 April 2005. The result of the discussion was keep due to addition of new material.
This article is rated Start-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects:
good and 1.0 standards, or visit the wikiproject page for more details.ReligionWikipedia:WikiProject ReligionTemplate:WikiProject ReligionReligion articles
Organizations on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.OrganizationsWikipedia:WikiProject OrganizationsTemplate:WikiProject Organizationsorganization articles
This article is within the scope of WikiProject United States, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of topics relating to the United States of America on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the ongoing discussions.
This article is of interest to WikiProject LGBT studies, which tries to ensure comprehensive and factual coverage of all LGBT-related issues on Wikipedia. For more information, or to get involved, please visit the project page or contribute to the discussion. Explanation for inclusion in WikiProject LGBT studies: While this is not an LGBT organization, its actions fall within the scope of this WikiProject.LGBT studiesWikipedia:WikiProject LGBT studiesTemplate:WikiProject LGBT studiesLGBT articles
Unavailable video, original research
Editor @
WP:OR. The defense for readding it was "Find the video and link to it if you think it's available. I'd love to watch", which seems to suggest that Wikipedia should not limit ourselves to things we can show to be true, but should include things that we cannot prove not to be true. The article will not suffer if we don't make the claim one way or the other, so there's really no reason to make the unsourced claim. --Nat Gertler (talk) 05:43, 10 March 2020 (UTC)[reply
]
The video clip is embedded in the Box Turtle Bulletin page, above the transcript[1]. Here's a direct youtube link: [2]. Cheers, gnu57 06:30, 10 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Thanks, gnu57! The supposed embedded clip still doesn't show up on my computer; others of the series do, but that one doesn't. But the YouTube link works! I'll add it to the refs. YoPienso (talk) 07:00, 10 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]
