Talk:Factor analysis of information risk

Computing Low‑importance

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject Computing, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of computers, computing, and information technology on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.ComputingWikipedia:WikiProject ComputingTemplate:WikiProject ComputingComputing articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Computer Security: Computing Mid‑importance

This article is within the scope of WikiProject Computer Security, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of computer security on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Computer SecurityWikipedia:WikiProject Computer SecurityTemplate:WikiProject Computer SecurityComputer Security articles

Mid

This article has been rated as Mid-importance on the project's importance scale.

This article is supported by WikiProject Computing (assessed as Low-importance).

Things you can help WikiProject Computer Security with:

AAlertBot. Please allow some days for processing. More information...

Answer question about Same-origin_policy
Review importance and quality of existing articles
Identify categories related to Computer Security
Tag related articles
Identify articles for creation (see also: Article requests)
Identify articles for improvement
Create the Project Navigation Box including lists of adopted articles, requested articles, reviewed articles, etc.
Find editors who have shown interest in this subject and ask them to take a look here.

This article is based on a proprietary method that charges for commercial use. Fairinstitute.org is a free Open Source standard. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 2601:80:4400:F4F0:DF3:725B:D118:B507 (talk) 01:52, 14 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Not a stub

Promoted to Start class, after editing. --Pastore Italy (talk) 18:03, 14 November 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Copyright problem removed

Prior content in this article duplicated one or more previously published sources. The material was copied from: http://www.riskmanagementinsight.com/media/docs/FAIR_introduction.pdf. Infringing material has been rewritten or removed and must not be restored, unless it is duly released under a compatible license. (For more information, please see

guideline on non-free text for how to properly implement limited quotations of copyrighted text. Wikipedia takes copyright violations very seriously, and persistent violators will be blocked from editing. While we appreciate contributions, we must require all contributors to understand and comply with these policies. Thank you. Pnm (talk) 02:45, 21 December 2010 (UTC)[reply

]

Text beginning "Six forms of loss are defined with FAIR" - pg 23
Text beginning "FAIR defines value/liability as" - pg 25
Text beginning "Threat agents can take one or more of the following actions against an asset" - pg 26
Text beginning "The risk is decomposed hierarchically in its factors" - headings and boldfaced text from pgs 18-21
List beginning "Probably Loss Magnitude (PLM)" - almost all text is found somewhere in pgs 25-29
List beginning "According to FAIR controls have three dimensions" – close paraphrase of pgs 31-32

CC-BY-NC-SA is not compatible with WIkipedia's license. --Pnm (talk) 02:45, 21 December 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Recent edits...

The entire tone of the article was changed by the edits made by User:Smjerbic, to the point where a Conflict of interest discussion was opened. Some discussion needs to be had about these edits, especially in light of the replacement of sources and a direct reference to a particular company's implementation. MSJapan (talk) 22:47, 2 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 2 external links on Factor analysis of information risk. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018.

regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check

}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 11:17, 27 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

pathetic article

This is a really ridiculous article that doesn't capture what FAIR is about at all. I practice FAIR almost daily and barely recognize it from this description. The author is obviously more familiar with other cybersecurity risk management models and confuses FAIR with them.

Needs a complete rework. No, I don't volunteer, tired of edit wars. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 194.96.92.160 (talk) 06:57, 10 April 2019 (UTC)[reply]