Talk:Falcon 9 booster B1021

Page contents not supported in other languages.
Source: Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia.

Vid

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=1gyrbKto5IQ from USLaunchReport has a compilation of videos of B1021 -- 70.51.200.162 (talk) 05:23, 27 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Booster vs first stage

@

rocket booster per Wikipedia is A booster rocket (or engine) is either the first stage of a multistage launch vehicle, or else a shorter-burning rocket used in parallel… So "booster" is absolutely a correct word to use, and we give context by saying it's a first-stage booster. Hope you will agree. — JFG talk 03:36, 4 May 2017 (UTC)[reply
]

Extent of refurbishment, and current state

What is known about the state after first and second recoveries, and the extent of refurbishment ? eg what parts got replaced ? turbopumps ? engines ? - Rod57 (talk) 18:14, 8 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Move?

I have proposed a move to another booster from spacex too, I think we should call it Falcon 9 core B1021 because Ive heard spacex refer to them as cores — Preceding unsigned comment added by YuriGagrin12 (talkcontribs) 19:26, 27 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

SpaceX does not necessarily decide the encyclopedic name, even if "core" were an
move request if you can show that most sources call it a "core". Will revert to the previous title until a discussion shows consensus to move. Same reasoning for other boosters in this series. — JFG talk 03:29, 28 December 2017 (UTC)[reply
]