Talk:Flame-faced tanager

Flame-faced tanager has been listed as one of the Natural sciences good articles under the good article criteria. If you can improve it further, please do so. If it no longer meets these criteria, you can reassess it. Review: October 6, 2021. (Reviewed version).

This article is rated GA-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects:

Birds Low‑importance Low This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale. WikiProject Birds To-do: edit history watch purge Here are some tasks awaiting attention: Wikify : Ninox boobook ocellata • The Institute for Bird Populations (more) Other : Add photos to bird articles needing photos (search Flickr for free images ). Add taxonomic authorities to genus articles. More outstanding tasks at the project's cleanup listing, Category:Birds articles needing attention, and Wikipedia:WikiProject Birds/Todo.

This review is

transcluded from Talk:Flame-faced tanager/GA1

. The edit link for this section can be used to add comments to the review.

Reviewer: The Rambling Man (talk · contribs) 19:56, 1 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Comments

• Link arthropods.

Done.

• Link fledgling.

Done.

• "by the IUCN. However" explain IUCN before using the initialism.

Done.

• "genus Tangara. Within" that's a dab page.

Fixed.

• "and golden tanager. This" overlinked.

Should have been golden-eared, fixed.

• "tanager.[7] All three subspecies are recognized" -> "tanager,[7] all of which are recognized"

Done.

• "Zimmer, 1943:" why not in parentheses like the others.

The parentheses are actually a way to show that a species or subspecies was described by the author in a different name than the one currently assigned i.e. the genus was different when the author described it.

• "weighing 28 g (0.99 oz)." average?

That it is an average is mentioned earlier in the sentence: I've reworded it so that it is maybe slightly clearer.

• "have 7 other species' seven.

Done.

• A couple of [clarification needed] tags in there.

Gleaning was already linked, and I've added an explanation. The second tag is after a subspecies name which has already been mentioned, so maybe you could remove it if you think it's clear enough.

• Date formats in the references should be consistent, either DD MM YYYY or YYYY-MM-DD, but not a mixture.

Fixed, all refs are now YYYY-MM-DD

That's all I have for now. The Rambling Man (Keep wearing the mask...) 19:42, 4 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]