Talk:Fort Riley

Page contents not supported in other languages.
Source: Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia.
WikiProject iconUnited States: Military history / Superfund Low‑importance
WikiProject iconThis article is within the scope of WikiProject United States, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of topics relating to the United States of America on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the ongoing discussions.
LowThis article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.
Taskforce icon
This article is supported by WikiProject Military history - U.S. military history task force.
Taskforce icon
This article is supported by WikiProject Superfund (assessed as Low-importance).
WikiProject iconKansas High‑importance
WikiProject iconThis article is within the scope of WikiProject Kansas, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of the U.S. state of Kansas on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.
HighThis article has been rated as High-importance on the project's importance scale.
WikiProject iconNational Register of Historic Places Low‑importance
WikiProject iconThis article is within the scope of WikiProject National Register of Historic Places, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of U.S. historic sites listed on the National Register of Historic Places on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.
LowThis article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

WikiProject Military history/Assessment/Tag & Assess 2008

Article reassessed and graded as start class. --dashiellx (talk) 14:35, 1 May 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Floods

Some one might want to integrate information from this article Great Flood of 1951 and other floods into the article. • SbmeirowTalk • 21:55, 31 July 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Photo

The building in the photo captioned as the "former garrison and division HQ..." is still in use as the Garrison HQ. The new Division HQ opened in 2007 and the Garrison took over the entire building. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 74.204.141.116 (talk) 20:49, 23 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]

I changed the caption so it states that garrison still uses the building. Amducker (talk) 05:56, 4 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]

yes, so it is correct. St. Vicina (talk) 07:59, 5 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Census designated places

It says the base includes two CDPs and immediately names four places. Wschart (talk) 23:48, 18 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]