Talk:Francisco Sá Carneiro

This article is rated B-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects:

Portugal High‑importance This article is within the scope of WikiProject Portugal, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Portugal on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.PortugalWikipedia:WikiProject PortugalTemplate:WikiProject PortugalPortugal articles High This article has been rated as High-importance on the project's importance scale. Portugal To-do: edit history watch purge Find correct name The airport is not listed as João Paulo II anywhere. The airport's own website calls itself simply Ponta Delgada, and has no mention of João Paulo. Improve key articles to Good article Portugal Lisbon Improve Os Lusíadas Coat of arms of Portugal More... Review Category:History of Portugal: lots to remove there Template:Regions of Portugal: statistical (NUTS3) subregions and intercommunal entities are confused; they are not the same in all regions, and should be sublisted separately in each region: intermunicipal entities are sometimes larger and split by subregions (e.g. the Metropolitan Area of Lisbon has two subregions), some intercommunal entities are containing only parts of subregions. All subregions should be listed explicitly and not assume they are only intermunicipal entities (which accessorily are not statistic subdivisions but real administrative entities, so they should be listed below, probably using a smaller font: we can safely eliminate the subgrouping by type of intermunicipal entity from this box). Requests See Requested articles Assess Help assessing articles. Need images Translate from Portuguese Wikipedia Wikify Vote: Watch this list — Edit this list inactive .PortoWikipedia:WikiProject PortoTemplate:WikiProject PortoPorto articles

	Biography: Politics and Government Start‑class
This article is supported by the politics and government work group.

After the last parlamentary commission report, shouldn't this article be updated to include the (now accepted) official explanation that it was a bomb that brought the plane down?

A link to the Irangate page seems logical considering that the most probable explanation for the bombing was to eliminate the Defense Minister (travelling on the same plane) after he just announced he had very important revelations to make (in 1980). Will it seem too much "conspiration theory"?

I see no problem, as long as you can link it to some fairly reputable source. David Cannon 12:09, 1 Jun 2005 (UTC)

This is too contentious to stand without good citations. A scribd page isn't enough really. Sophie means wisdom (talk) 20:28, 15 May 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just added archive links to one external link on

• Added archive https://web.archive.org/20041021093509/http://www.tsdnacional.com:80/pdf/mocao-sn.pdf to http://www.tsdnacional.com/pdf/mocao-sn.pdf

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true to let others know.

This message was posted before February 2018.

• If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
• If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers. —

• Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20041021093509/http://www.tsdnacional.com:80/pdf/mocao-sn.pdf to http://www.tsdnacional.com/pdf/mocao-sn.pdf

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018.

• If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
• If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 06:21, 4 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]