Talk:Fuccbois
This article is rated Start-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
A fact from Fuccbois appeared on Wikipedia's Main Page in the Did you know column on 4 January 2023 (check views). The text of the entry was as follows:
|
Did you know nomination
- The following is an archived discussion of the DYK nomination of the article below. Please do not modify this page. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as this nomination's talk page, the article's talk page or Wikipedia talk:Did you know), unless there is consensus to re-open the discussion at this page. No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was: promoted by Bruxton (talk) 00:30, 24 December 2022 (UTC)
- ... that Fuccbois' crew won awards, while Fuccboi's prose received both praise and criticism?
- Reviewed: Discrimination against people with red hair, Volodymyr Kozhukhar (diff of granting from Drmies)
- Comment: When Wikipedians come together, we are capable of wondrous things that push the horizon out just a little farther. Sometimes. Alternate hooks and new articles from any of our co-conspirators are more than welcome :)
Fuccbois created by talk), HelenDegenerate (talk), and Drmies (talk). Fuccboi created by HelenDegenerate (talk), Drmies (talk), Tamzin (talk), and theleekycauldron (talk). Nominated by theleekycauldron (talk) at 08:10, 11 December 2022 (UTC).]
- Reviewing... Onegreatjoke (talk) 17:53, 11 December 2022 (UTC)
- Please don't forget to add me as creator of both articles--thanks. Drmies (talk) 03:58, 12 December 2022 (UTC)
- Added you and Tamzin :) theleekycauldron (talk • contribs) (she/her) 05:22, 12 December 2022 (UTC)
General: Article is new enough and long enough |
---|
Policy: Article is sourced, neutral, and free of copyright problems |
---|
|
Hook: Hook has been verified by provided inline citation |
---|
|
QPQ: Done. |
Overall: @Theleekycauldron: Good articles. Very annoyed at the fact that someone would go out of their way to vandalize these articles for no reason. Onegreatjoke (talk) 14:35, 12 December 2022 (UTC)
- Onegreatjoke, I am sure they had a reason--a very sad and lonely and pathetic reason. Drmies (talk) 16:16, 12 December 2022 (UTC)