Talk:GNU social

This article is rated Start-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to multiple WikiProjects.

Computing Low‑importance This article is within the scope of WikiProject Computing, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of computers, computing, and information technology on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.ComputingWikipedia:WikiProject ComputingTemplate:WikiProject ComputingComputing articles Low This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale. inactive .OpenWikipedia:WikiProject OpenTemplate:WikiProject OpenOpen articles

	Technology
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Technology, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of technology on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.TechnologyWikipedia:WikiProject TechnologyTemplate:WikiProject TechnologyTechnology articles

Software: Computing

This article is within the scope of WikiProject Software, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of software on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.SoftwareWikipedia:WikiProject SoftwareTemplate:WikiProject Softwaresoftware articles ??? This article has not yet received a rating on the project's importance scale. This article is supported by WikiProject Computing.

How is this notable? —Preceding unsigned comment added by 117.192.112.113 (talk) 14:08, 20 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]

The StatusNet software is open source, freely downloadable and deployable under the GNU Affero General Public License. This sets it apart from other microblogging –-- and indeed, most other social networking --- services. yoyo (talk) 17:49, 3 October 2009 (UTC)[reply]

We have >12,000 sites on status.net cloud hosting, plus another 2K sites on the public web. --ESP (talk) 01:38, 26 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]

We've released our 1.0.0 version.

http://status.net/2011/09/30/statusnet-1-0-0-its-the-end-of-the-world-as-we-know-it-and-i-feel-fine

-ESP (talk) 20:01, 30 September 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just added archive links to one external link on

• Added archive https://web.archive.org/20090221091623/http://mail.laconi.ca:80/pipermail/laconica-dev/2009-January/000833.html to http://mail.laconi.ca/pipermail/laconica-dev/2009-January/000833.html

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true to let others know.

This message was posted before February 2018.

• If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
• If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—

I have just modified 5 external links on GNU social. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

• Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20090831073527/http://status.net/2009/08/28/laconica-is-now-statusnet/ to http://status.net/2009/08/28/laconica-is-now-statusnet/
• Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20090125091407/http://openmode.ca/2008/08/why-laconica-means-big-things-for-corporate-micro-blogging/ to http://openmode.ca/2008/08/why-laconica-means-big-things-for-corporate-micro-blogging/
• Added archive https://archive.is/20120717054603/http://status.net/wiki/StatusNet_0.9.0 to http://status.net/wiki/StatusNet_0.9.0
• Added archive https://archive.is/20120720130102/http://status.net/2010/03/04/statusnet-0-9-0-released to http://status.net/2010/03/04/statusnet-0-9-0-released
• Added archive https://archive.is/20130112041805/http://status.net/wiki/StatusNet_0.8.1 to http://status.net/wiki/StatusNet_0.8.1

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018.

• If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
• If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 16:34, 9 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Quitter (social network) redirects here, but isn't mentioned anywhere in the article (save the title of an external link), so the reader who searches for it is left none the wiser as to what it is. Said link describes Quitter as "a specific installation of GNU social", so adding a mention seems reasonable, but I know nothing about the subject(s). Can a mention be added to make the redirect useful? – Arms & Hearts (talk) 19:33, 29 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]

A discussion is taking place to address the redirect Quitter (social network). The discussion will occur at Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2021 February 12#Quitter (social network) until a consensus is reached, and readers of this page are welcome to contribute to the discussion. – Arms & Hearts (talk) 17:02, 12 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

There is no archive download option. What may be the reason?. But it is excellent choice for bloggers. B947106 (talk) 14:08, 21 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]