Talk:Georgia Right to Life

Page contents not supported in other languages.
Source: Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia.
WikiProject iconGeorgia (U.S. state) Low‑importance
WikiProject iconThis article is within the scope of WikiProject Georgia (U.S. state), a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of the U.S. state of Georgia on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.
LowThis article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.
WikiProject Georgia (U.S. state) To-do:

Here are some tasks awaiting attention:
WikiProject iconAbortion
WikiProject iconThis article is within the scope of WikiProject Abortion, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Abortion on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.
???This article has not yet received a rating on the project's importance scale.

[Untitled]

Google News shows there are sources discussing this organization [1]. But the current article is not encyclopedic and seems to use Wikipedia as a webhost for the organization, without including any reliable independent sources. ChildofMidnight (talk) 01:30, 18 September 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Neutrality

This article has obviously been written by a member of the organisation. It is written like an advert, emphasizing the opinions of the organisation, without any criticism (if there is any). The article directly quotes the organisation, and a large proportion of the references are from non-neutral (pro life) group. Most of the external links are pro-life groups. user:Martin451

Agreed. The content should be based mostly on reliable independent sources. A google news search shows there are sources (and I haven't look at Google books to see if there's anything there) so that's the place to start. ChildofMidnight (talk) 17:36, 22 September 2009 (UTC)[reply]


How should the current language be changed so it reads more like a neutral encyclopedia? Are there positive adjectives or suggestions in the text that I missed? user: Mission: Life

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 9 external links on Georgia Right to Life. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018.

regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check
}} (last update: 18 January 2022).

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 14:16, 10 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 5 external links on Georgia Right to Life. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018.

regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check
}} (last update: 18 January 2022).

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 11:26, 14 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]