Talk:giFT

This article is rated Start-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects:

Computing: Software / Free and open-source software Low‑importance This article is within the scope of WikiProject Computing, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of computers, computing, and information technology on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.ComputingWikipedia:WikiProject ComputingTemplate:WikiProject ComputingComputing articles Low This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale. This article is supported by WikiProject Software. This article is supported by Free and open-source software (assessed as Low-importance).

Is giFT still maintained, or is it dead? There haven't been any new releases in a *long* time...

See for yourself: http://sourceforge.net/projects/gift ¦

Reisio 22:53, 26 July 2006 (UTC)[reply

]

AFAIK, accented Latin characters such as "ø","ä", "å", "é", "è", "ó", "ö", etc., are already included in ISO-8859-1(read: 8-bit extended ASCII), and therefore have never required Unicode support to be displayed correctly. Unless you meant that GiFT was designed so badly that could handle only 100%-pure-ASCII filenames. KSM-2501ZX, IP address:= 200.143.28.19 16:31, 16 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]

How is remote-side supposed to know which character encoding the other peer uses? That would require negotiation with each single peer and support for numerous character encodings. ISO-8859-1 covers only Latin-1. The above characters are just examples anyway. Arabic, Japanese, Cyrillic wouldn't work at all unless maybe all peers stick to the same encoding. That's why modern file-sharing networks use Unicode whereas olders didn't give a damn, only worked for ASCII or some other subsets. --217.87.68.60 12:30, 6 September 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Berlios have posted "Jazza"[1] in Feb last year_> MonstaPro:^{Talk:Contrib.} 13:43, 26 September 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Most of those separate articles clearly fail

How much of this article do you want taken up by separate frontends, screen captures and data found in the 'Infobox Software' section of the applications that currently have articles. I'm willing to admit that most probably arent notable enough for articles themselves but i believe that the information is useful. MrMacMan ^Talk 09:40, 15 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]

An image used in this article, File:Poisoned screenshot.png, has been nominated for speedy deletion for the following reason: Wikipedia files with no non-free use rationale as of 9 December 2011 What should I do? Don't panic; you should have time to contest the deletion (although please review deletion guidelines before doing so). The best way to contest this form of deletion is by posting on the image talk page. If the image is fair use rationale If the image isn't freely licensed and there is no fair use rationale, then it cannot be uploaded or used. If the image has already been deleted you may want to try Deletion Review This notification is provided by a Bot -- talk) 15:15, 9 December 2011 (UTC)[reply ]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on GiFT. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

• Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20110927104419/http://www.zeropaid.com/news/1038/gift_internet_file_transfer/ to http://www.zeropaid.com/news/1038/gift_internet_file_transfer/

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018.

• If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
• If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 14:07, 11 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 2 external links on GiFT. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

• Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20140424193328/http://developer.berlios.de/projects/gift-fasttrack/ to http://developer.berlios.de/projects/gift-fasttrack/
• Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20051107093249/http://developer.berlios.de/projects/gift-ares/ to http://developer.berlios.de/projects/gift-ares/

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018.

• If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
• If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 17:27, 15 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Why it redirects here? not mentioned anywhere on the page . — Preceding