Talk:Giffords Law Center to Prevent Gun Violence

Page contents not supported in other languages.
Source: Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia.
WikiProject iconLaw Low‑importance
WikiProject iconThis article is within the scope of WikiProject Law, an attempt at providing a comprehensive, standardised, pan-jurisdictional and up-to-date resource for the legal field and the subjects encompassed by it.LawWikipedia:WikiProject LawTemplate:WikiProject Lawlaw articles
LowThis article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.
WikiProject iconPolitics: Gun politics
WikiProject iconThis article is within the scope of WikiProject Politics, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of politics on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.PoliticsWikipedia:WikiProject PoliticsTemplate:WikiProject Politicspolitics articles
???This article has not yet received a rating on the project's importance scale.
Taskforce icon
This article is supported by Gun politics task force.
WikiProject iconUnited States
WikiProject iconThis article is within the scope of WikiProject United States, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of topics relating to the United States of America on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the ongoing discussions.
United StatesWikipedia:WikiProject United StatesTemplate:WikiProject United StatesUnited States articles
???This article has not yet received a rating on the project's importance scale.

Public Interest Law vs Think Tank or Advocacy organization

Would just like to get input on exactly how to classify this particular organization. Is this a public interest law organization or a think tank or advocacy organization? It seems to advocate or push for certain laws to be passed, much like a think tank would. Thoughts? Krakaet (talk) 17:55, 11 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]

NPOV/Advert issues

Lots of NPOV issues here. The whole thing feels like a press release. Faceless Enemy (talk) 22:36, 11 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Specifically what? I gave it a quick view and didn't see anything wrong. SimplyACat (talk) 17:32, 25 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]

"civil rights organization"

The article currently reads "By 1999, the civil rights organization began to develop a national strategy". I believe

the responsibility for showing a reliable source for that description is on you. I'm planning to remove it again in a bit, but I'll wait to see whether you can find a source. I've looked and been unable to find any. Faceless Enemy (talk) 17:49, 12 December 2015 (UTC)[reply
]

Although I have reinserted, I am not the original inserter of the text. I don't know why you feel gun violence is a right, but you are correct that the text should be cited and the original author did not do so. I will leave out until one is found. EarlyNews (talk) 20:07, 4 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on

Law Center to Prevent Gun Violence. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ
for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018.

regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check
}} (last update: 18 January 2022).

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 14:45, 18 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Updates to Improve Article - June 14, 2022

Hello! I have a few suggested proposals to help improve the quality of the article.

I have a conflict of interest - I currently work for the Giffords Law Center, and didn’t want to edit the article directly. My proposals include corrections, replacing primary sources, and providing reliable sources.

Is it possible to get an independent review of the requests below?


1. Please replace the first paragraph of the lead:

From:


“The Giffords Law Center to Prevent Gun Violence (Giffords Law Center)....”


To:

Giffords Law Center to Prevent Gun Violence is an American

gun laws and gun violence.[2][5] Giffords Law Center was formed when the Legal Community Against Violence (LCAV) merged with Giffords’ Americans for Responsible Solutions in 2016.[6][7]


Explanation: Rewrites for structure and concision, and to remove “The” from the name of the organization, as it’s not part of the name. Removes abbreviation LCPGV; the organization does not use an acronym, and is not abbreviated in the press. The Manual of Style says: Wikipedia:Manual_of_Style#Do_not_invent_abbreviations_or_acronyms. Adds that the organization was founded by former Congresswoman Giffords, and clarifies that the organization specializes in gun safety legislation and litigation against the gun industry. Removes reference the organization opposes firearm ownership, as the statement is unsupported by sources and is untrue. . Removes language (e.g. “elected officials, government attorneys and activists”) unsupported by the sources. Updates internal Wikipedia hyperlink to U.S. gun policy. Adds reliable sourcing.


2. In the History section, please replace the first paragraph:


From: “LCPGV was established in the wake of a shooting attack on a law firm in downtown San Francisco on July 1, 1993. A gunman armed with several weapons, including a semi-automatic pistol, shot 14 people at the law firm of Pettit and Martin at 101 California Street in San Francisco before turning a gun on himself. In response, Bay Area lawyers established LCPGV.[8]”

To:

LCAV was established in the wake of the July 1,1993 101 California Street shooting, during which a gunman entered the offices of law firm Petit & Martin and shot fourteen people, killing eight.[9] Former Petit & Martin partners John Heisse and Chuck Erlich formed the nonprofit organization shortly after the shooting to help local communities pass their own gun control ordinances.[10][11]

Explanation: Removes LCPGV - an acronym that is not used in the sources. Wikipedia:Manual_of_Style#Do_not_invent_abbreviations_or_acronyms. Removes extraneous details about the 101 California Street shooting. Adds information about the founders of LCAV and why the organization was formed, with reliable sources. Adds missing reliable sourcing. Rewrites paragraph for grammar and concision.

3. In the History sentence, please replace the first sentence of the second paragraph:

From: “LCPGV started in 1993 by focusing on the local regulation of firearms in California, adopting a "local ordinance project" that successfully promoted the adoption of local gun laws in many municipalities.[11][12]


To: Initially focusing on the local regulation of firearms in California, LCAV supported the passage of the

West Hollywood when it was sued by the National Rifle Association in January 1996 for banning Saturday Night Special handguns. The lawsuit was dismissed in November 1996.[11][13]

Explanation: Removes LCPGV - an acronym that is not used by the organization. Wikipedia:Manual_of_Style#Do_not_invent_abbreviations_or_acronyms. Removes the first sentence for redundancy. Expands on history and LCAV’s role in the Brady Bill, assault weapons and Saturday Night Specials ban. Adds reliable sourcing.


4. In the History section, please remove the third and fourth paragraphs:

“In 2001, LCPGV launched a website to provide access to detailed gun law and policy-related materials such as summaries of federal, state and local firearms laws; detailed discussion of the Second Amendment to the U.S. Constitution; summaries of firearm-related policies; research and analysis on firearms law and policy; amicus curiae briefs filed in firearm-related litigation; and model legislation for states and localities. The website, also called the Firearms Law Center, was designed to aid local efforts to adopt new gun control ordinances.[14]

“With the launch of the site, LCPGV formally began offering legal support to activists and officials across the country. LCPGV launched a membership program to strengthen the legal community’s role in helping to promote gun control and continues to publish comprehensive reports and analyses of gun violence. Following the landmark U.S. Supreme Court cases

McDonald v. Chicago, which ruled that the Second Amendment protects an individual's right to possess a firearm for lawful purposes, LCPGV has become increasingly involved in Second Amendment litigation and tracks cases raising Second Amendment claims.[15]

Explanation: Source for the first of these paragraphs is a violation of

WP:PROMOTIONAL
without a reliable source.

In the second of these paragraphs, the sentences are unsourced; it is also false that “LCPGV formally began offering legal support” in 2001 – as explained and reliably sourced in Request # 2, LCAV began offering legal services in 1993.. I could not find a secondary source that supported the statement that Law Center has a membership program; they do not have a membership program listed on their website. The last sentence source is a violation of

WP:PRIMARY
as it requires significant interpretation and analysis of content from the website of the subject of the article.


5. Please replace the last paragraph of the History section:

From:

“In 2016, the organization merged with Americans for Responsible Solutions, led by former Congresswoman Gabby Giffords and Navy combat veteran and retired NASA astronaut Captain Mark Kelly. In 2017, the organization changed its name to the Giffords Law Center to Prevent Gun Violence.”

To:

In 2016, Legal Community Against Violence merged with Americans for Responsible Solutions, led by former Congresswoman Gabby Giffords and Navy combat veteran and retired NASA astronaut Captain Mark Kelly.[7][6] The organization changed its name to Giffords Law Center to Prevent Gun Violence in 2017.[16]

Explanation: Adds reliable sources to unsourced statements and slightly rewrites for clarity and structure.


6. Please add the following to the end of the History section: In 2019, Giffords Law Center sued the Federal Election Commission, alleging the regulatory agency failed to take action against the National Rifle Association for alleged campaign finance violations.[17] The lawsuit, filed by Giffords and the Campaign Legal Center, states the FEC did not respond to multiple complaints accusing the NRA of using shell organizations to donate more than the legal amount to the campaigns of President Trump and six Republican Senate candidates.[17][18] In response, the NRA stated “This latest effort by Giffords and the Campaign Legal Center is a frivolous lawsuit based on a frivolous complaint.”[17]

When the FEC did not take action, the Giffords Law Center filed a federal lawsuit directly against the National Rifle Association in November 2021.[19]

Explanation: Updates the article with lawsuits receiving substantial coverage by high-quality publications.


7. In the “Reports and state rankings” subsection, please replace this paragraph:

From:

The center releases an annual gun-law scorecard for individual states. The center has argued that "its research shows that states with stronger gun laws suffer fewer gun deaths."[20] To:

Giffords Law Center provides comparisons of state gun laws online,[21] and annually releases the Gun Law Scorecard, a report that ranks and measures individual states’ gun death rates in correlation to their gun laws.[22][23] According to the organization, its research shows there are fewer gun deaths in states with strict gun laws.[20]

Explanation: Rewrites the paragraph for clarity and structure. Provides details and explanation of the annual scorecard as covered by high-quality publications.

8. In the infobox, please update the logo. This logo is newer:

GiffordsLC Logo Primary RGB (1).png

Thank you. Brooklyn1576 (talk) 17:58, 14 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]

References

  1. ^ Hernandez, Joe (3 Nov 2021). "The NRA is being sued for allegedly breaking campaign finance law to back Republicans". NPR. Retrieved 2 May 2022.
  2. ^ a b Lodhi, Humera; Gibson, Jelani (29 October 2020). "Kansas City residents: Lack of trust drives crime". US News & World Report. Kansas City Star. Retrieved 29 April 2022.
  3. ^ Swan, Rachel (1 July 2018). "Legacy of 1993 SF rampage". San Francisco Chronicle. Retrieved 2 May 2022.
  4. ^ Hernandez, Joe (3 Nov 2021). "The NRA is being sued for allegedly breaking campaign finance law to back Republicans". NPR. Retrieved 2 May 2022.
  5. ^ Roach, Sarah (1 June 2018). "Study: Suicide Rate, Gun Laws Linked". Times Union. Retrieved 2 May 2022.
  6. ^ a b Komanecky, DeAnn (27 Oct 2019). "Gun violence costs lives, money: Illegal, legal access to firearms continues to confound authorities: Illegal, legal access to firearms continues to confound authorities". Savannah Morning News. Retrieved 10 May 2022.
  7. ^ a b Egelko, Bob (15 June 2018). "Hillary Clinton, in SF visit, calls gun safety 'a political necessity'". San Francisco Chronicle. Retrieved 29 April 2022.
  8. ^ Richard C. Paddock, "Gun Control Push Begun at Law Firm : Massacre: Employees return to San Francisco building targeted by gunman. Some have formed a group that will call for stricter legislation." Los Angeles Times, July 7, 1993.
  9. ^ Carter, Terry (April 2001). "Battles Won, War Continues: Lawyers' group succeeds locally with firearms initiatives, looks to branch out". ABA Journal. 87. American Bar Association: 24–25.
  10. ^ Richard C. Paddock, "Gun Control Push Begun at Law Firm : Massacre: Employees return to San Francisco building targeted by gunman. Some have formed a group that will call for stricter legislation." Los Angeles Times, July 7, 1993.
  11. ^ a b c d Laura Linden, "Disarming Tactics: Why is a group of well-heeled lawyers helping empower local communities to pass stricter gun control ordinances? Take a look behind-the-scenes of the unusual grass roots organizing project that's been successfully outwitting the California gun lobby." Mother Jones, March 3, 1997.
  12. ISBN 978-0691124247, pp. 180-182. Excerpts available at Google Books
    .
  13. ISBN 978-1576072684, vol. 1, pp. 354-355. Excerpts available at Google Books
    .
  14. ^ Nancy McCarthy, "10 years after 101 California Street shooting, repercussions reverberate" Archived 2013-10-16 at the Wayback Machine, California Bar Journal, July 2003.
  15. ^ "About Us", Law Center to Prevent Gun Violence official website (accessed 2013-02-14).
  16. ^ Dumain, Emma (3 June 2019). "SC taxpayers pay for gun violence: Overall annual cost in state is $1.5B, study says". The Greenville News. Retrieved 10 May 2022.
  17. ^ a b c Itkowitz, Colby (24 April 2019). "NRA at center of new lawsuit against the Federal Election Commission". Washington Post. Retrieved 10 May 2022.
  18. ^ Oprysko, Caitlin (2 Nov 2021). "Giffords sues NRA alleging campaign finance violations". Politico. Retrieved 2 May 2022.
  19. ^ Hernandez, Joe (3 Nov 2021). "The NRA is being sued for allegedly breaking campaign finance law to back Republicans". NPR. Retrieved 2 May 2022.
  20. ^ a b "Archived copy". Archived from the original on 2020-02-17. Retrieved 2020-02-17.{{cite web}}: CS1 maint: archived copy as title (link)
  21. ^ Moore, Daniel (23 October 2019). "Battle For Gun Control At Stalemate - With Political Gridlock In Washington, Is There A Way Forward?". Pittsburgh Post-Gazette. Retrieved 29 April 2022.
  22. ^ Christie, Bob (17 Feb 2022). "Arizona Could Ease Gun Rules for Libraries, School Grounds". US News & World Report. Associated Press. Retrieved 9 May 2022.
  23. ^ Zokovitch, Grace (24 Feb 2022). "Missouri lawmakers continue to chip away at gun restrictions". St. Louis Post-Dispatch. Retrieved 9 May 2022.
@Cs california: Thank you for your review of this request edit proposal. I have one request: in the first sentence of the introduction, can you change "conducted litigation" to "has conducted litigation" or "conducts litigation" as this is an ongoing activity of the organization. Since everything else is answered, I think you can also mark the request edit as "request edit|Yes" to close it, based on what I see on other Talk pages. Many thanks!Brooklyn1576 (talk) 16:58, 15 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Retrieved from "https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Talk:Giffords_Law_Center_to_Prevent_Gun_Violence&oldid=1207118827"