Talk:Gospel of Luke
This is the talk page for discussing improvements to the Gospel of Luke article. This is not a forum for general discussion of the article's subject. |
Article policies
|
Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL |
Archives: Index, 1, 2, 3, 4Auto-archiving period: 365 days |
This level-5 vital article is rated B-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | ||||||||||||||||
|
Bible Top‑importance | |||||||
|
Ancient Near East High‑importance | |||||||
|
Books | ||||
Christology (Luke 3:22)
"where virtually all the earliest witnesses have God saying, "This day I have begotten you."[41]Ehrman 1996, p. 66." What earliest sources are these?
- P4, Vaticanus, Sinaiticus, Alexandrinus, Washingtonianus have "well pleased".
- P75, P45, Borgianus do not contain the passage.
The only relatively early text I found with "begotten" is Bezae.
"Repent or Perish" listed at Redirects for discussion
The redirect Repent or Perish has been listed at redirects for discussion to determine whether its use and function meets the redirect guidelines. Readers of this page are welcome to comment on this redirect at Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2023 June 11 § Repent or Perish until a consensus is reached. Veverve (talk) 07:14, 11 June 2023 (UTC)
"Luke, Gospel of Saint" listed at Redirects for discussion
The redirect Luke, Gospel of Saint has been listed at redirects for discussion to determine whether its use and function meets the redirect guidelines. Readers of this page are welcome to comment on this redirect at Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2023 June 11 § Luke, Gospel of Saint until a consensus is reached. Veverve (talk) 07:14, 11 June 2023 (UTC)
"Luke, Gospel according to" listed at Redirects for discussion
The redirect Luke, Gospel according to has been listed at redirects for discussion to determine whether its use and function meets the redirect guidelines. Readers of this page are welcome to comment on this redirect at Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2023 June 11 § Luke, Gospel according to until a consensus is reached. Veverve (talk) 07:15, 11 June 2023 (UTC)
Citing Ehrman
Ehrman's argument about Luke 3:22 is fringe. It is only attested in one manuscript although also used by some Church Fathers.
Joseph Fitzmyer argues the passage was changed to the "today I have begotten thee" because of its parallel to Psalm 2:7. Divus303 (talk) 16:23, 24 July 2023 (UTC)
- I'm not sure what it actually means. Does it mean "what Luke originally wrote" or does it mean "what was originally spoken"? StAnselm (talk) 16:27, 24 July 2023 (UTC)
Fringe
I have reverted some
r/Academic8iblical @ Search Reddit
psstein • 16 days ago
Moderator MA I History of Science
I don't know if I'd call Blomberg an outright apologist, though he frequently writes with an apologetic slant or purpose. He strikes me as part of the conservative evangelical scholarly ecosystem that really only talks to itself. Scholars like Blomberg are not publishing in the leading journals or with major presses.
Very broadly speaking, if you're routinely publishing with academic or respected religious publishers (e.g. Eerdmans, Fortress, Eisenbrauns) and have articles appear in mainstream journals (CBQ, JSNT), you're much less likely to be an apologist.
See the evidence quoted at User:Tgeorgescu/sandbox3. The mainstream academic view is that the NT gospels are fundamentally anonymous.
I don't say that conservative evangelicals should not get