Talk:Gotthold Eisenstein

This  level-5 vital article is rated Start-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects:

Germany Low‑importance This article is within the scope of WikiProject Germany, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Germany on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.GermanyWikipedia:WikiProject GermanyTemplate:WikiProject GermanyGermany articles Low This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale. Biography: Science and Academia This article is within the scope of WikiProject Biography, a collaborative effort to create, develop and organize Wikipedia's articles about people. All interested editors are invited to join the project and contribute to the discussion. For instructions on how to use this banner, please refer to the documentation.BiographyWikipedia:WikiProject BiographyTemplate:WikiProject Biographybiography articles This article is supported by the science and academia work group. Mathematics Mid‑priority

I removed the Four functions and sixteen Eisenstein series (by Heung Yeung Lam) link to a paper for the following reasons: there are hundreds of papers dealing with Eisenstein series; this particular one is published by a little known author at a little known journal, and finally since it has no relevance to the biography of Eisenstein. At best this link belongs to a math subject, not the biographical entry. Unless the contributor wants to explain on this page why this particular paper is relevant I believe this link should be kept out. Mhym 04:20, 13 June 2006 (UTC)[reply]

His common name is and was Gotthold. You should not list him under Ferdinand E., even though his first name was Ferdinand, but he was called Gotthold by people. Also see German article, de:Gotthold Eisenstein -andy 80.129.82.33 04:08, 3 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]

"Gauss's choice of Eisenstein, who specialized in number theory and analysis, may seem puzzling to many, but Eisenstein proved several results that even eluded Gauss, such as the theorem on biquadratic reciprocity."

If we are meant to make the inference that Gauss was being partially self-serving in his statement, it might be okay to spell it out in the article more clearly. I think we did that with respect to the Isaac Newton "standing on the shoulders of giants" supposedly noble statement - but infact a gibe at Hooke, who was low of stature. -- Cimon Avaro; on a pogostick. (talk) 04:09, 29 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]

I agree to the above proposition to refer to Eisenstein as Gotthold Eisenstein, not Ferdinand. His articles (at least the ones I looked at in Crelle's Journal) refer to their author as G. Eisenstein. Compare this to Carl Friedrich Gauss who nobody ever refers to as Johann Gauss, even though his first name was Johann. Apparently using a second name as common name was quite customary in 19th century Germany. So I propose to move this article to Gotthold Eisenstein, and to adapt its contents correspondingly. Marc van Leeuwen (talk) 09:29, 21 March 2011 (UTC)[reply]

The following statement is inconsistent. "but Eisenstein proved several results that eluded even Gauss, such as the theorem on biquadratic reciprocity." If you follow the link to biquadratic reciprocity, it takes you to quadratic reciprocity, which states Gauss was the first one to prove it. Therefore, either the statement is wrong or the link to biquadratic reciprocity is wrong. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 71.164.217.178 (talk) 13:52, 19 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]

I fixed it to link to quartic reciprocity instead of quadratic reciprocity Virginia-American (talk) 14:19, 26 March 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Well spotted! Looks like the original link was made before the quartic reciprocity article existed. Marc van Leeuwen (talk) 13:17, 27 March 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Gotthold Eisenstein. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

• Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20120331110824/http://www.gap-system.org/~history/Biographies/Eisenstein.html to http://www.gap-system.org/~history/Biographies/Eisenstein.html

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018.

• If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
• If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 23:51, 1 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]