Talk:Gran Torre Costanera

	Architecture portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Architecture, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Architecture on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.ArchitectureWikipedia:WikiProject ArchitectureTemplate:WikiProject ArchitectureArchitecture articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Skyscrapers Top‑importance

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject Skyscrapers, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of articles that relate to skyscrapers on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.SkyscrapersWikipedia:WikiProject SkyscrapersTemplate:WikiProject SkyscrapersSkyscraper articles
Top	This article has been rated as Top-importance on the project's importance scale.

It is requested that an architectural diagram or diagrams be included in this article to improve its quality. Specific illustrations, plots or diagrams can be requested at the Graphic Lab.
For more information, refer to discussion on this page and/or the listing at Wikipedia:Requested images.

Photo

Are there any photographs / computer generated images of the finished building available?

Reason

Is there a good reason to build a 300 mts tall tower in Chile, a land proclive to earthquakes? —Preceding unsigned comment added by 190.55.116.19 (talk) 04:21, 5 June 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Yes, Santiago lies in a valley, which is almost totally covered by the city. Space is getting very expensive, and therefore they are starting to build up high towers. Of course it's also a bit of "show-off" about the current economic rise of the country. The earthquakes are no major issue for the high towers (rather an issue on historic buildings). Torre Titanium was already finished when the big earthquake came up, no damage was reported at all. --194.203.215.219 (talk) 12:59, 29 April 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Requested move

The following discussion is an archived discussion of a
requested move
. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on the talk page. No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the move request was: page moved. Vegaswikian (talk) 23:10, 9 October 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Torre Gran Costanera (building) → Torre Gran Costanera — Correct name. Pristino (talk) 05:16, 2 October 2010 (UTC)[reply

]

Comment - the real move request here is from "Gran Torre Costanera" to "Torre Gran Costanera", as the nominator moved Gran Torre Costanera to Torre Gran Costanera (building) earlier. — Amakuru (talk) 22:13, 2 October 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Support - however, despite the above confusion I am happy to support as it does appear from Google that "Torre Gran Costanera" is the correct title. Only SkyScraper city has it differently. — Amakuru (talk) 22:14, 2 October 2010 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of a
requested move
. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on this talk page. No further edits should be made to this section.

Requested move 2

talk) 16:45, 14 October 2010 (UTC)[reply

]

Done. Jafeluv (talk) 10:37, 23 November 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Diagram

Add a height comparison diagram with other tall buildings. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 24.47.76.143 (talk) 21:24, 9 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Name

The name of the tower is "Torre 2" (Tower 2): http://www.costaneracenter.cl/oficinas/disponibilidad_torre02.html, I propose the name "Costanera Center Torre 2" (Costanera Center Tower 2) as it appears here: http://www.costaneracenter.cl/oficinas/pdf/pdfdp.pdf. --Cstnr15 (talk) 12:48, 15 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 2 external links on

Gran Torre Santiago. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ

for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018.

regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check

}} (last update: 18 January 2022).

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 11:18, 20 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]