Talk:Hallow, Worcestershire

This article is rated Start-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects:

UK geography Low‑importance Low This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale. England Low‑importance This article is within the scope of WikiProject England, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of England on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.EnglandWikipedia:WikiProject EnglandTemplate:WikiProject EnglandEngland-related articles Low This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale. Worcestershire Low‑importance This article is within the scope of WikiProject Worcestershire, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Worcestershire-related articles on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.WorcestershireWikipedia:WikiProject WorcestershireTemplate:WikiProject WorcestershireWorcestershire articles Low This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

It is requested that an image or photograph of Hallow parish church be included in this article to improve its quality. Please replace this template with a more specific media request template where possible. Wikipedians in Worcestershire may be able to help! The Free Image Search Tool or Openverse Creative Commons Search may be able to locate suitable images on Flickr and other web sites.

Upload

I don't consider the Genuki site a reliable reference. It's a private site, much of it is out of date and its owner does not allow communication although this may be an oversight in web design.--Kudpung (talk) 03:10, 16 July 2009 (UTC)[reply]

I agree. I've deleted the citation and rewritten the article citing printed sources plus public websites whose material is also published in print. Motacilla (talk) 22:15, 21 July 2010 (UTC)[reply]